George Gervin
1976–77 to 1985–86 · 10 seasons
NBA player comparison
George Gervin vs. Walter Davis: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact
Walter Davis
1977–78 to 1991–92 · 15 seasons
Impact comparison
#148Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+4.6LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.3
+3.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.2
9.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better10.3
+2,492 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,362 pts
55.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better37.4Leads
Career Impact Rank places Walter Davis #139 and George Gervin #148. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. George Gervin had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGeorge Gervin19.393 · No. 148Walter Davis18.227 · No. 139
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
George Gervin
19.393 composite · No. 148 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 71977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 9.667 | 50% | 4.833 |
| Best 5No. 71977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 11.600 | 30% | 3.480 |
| Best 10No. 71977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1881985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 55.400 | 20% | 11.080 |
4.833 + 3.480 + 11.080= 19.393
Walter Davis
18.227 composite · No. 139 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 10.333 | 50% | 5.167 |
| Best 5No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 18.600 | 30% | 5.580 |
| Best 10No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 37.400 | 20% | 7.480 |
5.167 + 5.580 + 7.480= 18.227
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #148 | #139Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 9.7Better result for this metric. | 10.3 |
| Best 5 average finish | 11.6Better result for this metric. | 18.6 |
| Best 10 average finish | 55.4 | 37.4Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #130Better result for this metric. | #137 |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +4.6Better result for this metric. | +4.3 |
| Best 3 average impact | +4.1Better result for this metric. | +3.9 |
| Best 5 average impact | +3.7Better result for this metric. | +3.2 |
| Best 10 average impact | +2.0 | +2.2Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +2,492 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +2,362 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 1Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 2 | 2 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 791 | 1,033 |
| Minutes | 26,536 | 28,859 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 57.2%Better result for this metric. | 55.8% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 57.0%Better result for this metric. | 56.6% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 51.1% | 51.1% |
| Three-point percentage | 29.7%Better result for this metric. | 27.2% |
| Free-throw percentage | 84.4% | 85.1%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 13.0% | 21.6%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.8 | 3.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 11.5%Better result for this metric. | 13.0% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 7.2%Better result for this metric. | 5.9% |
| Rebounds per game | 4.6Better result for this metric. | 3.0 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.6% | 2.0%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.3%Better result for this metric. | 0.3% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | George Gervin | Walter Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 26.2Better result for this metric. | 18.9 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact.
George GervinMetricWalter Davis
#148Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+4.6LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.3
+3.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.2
+2,492 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,362 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
George GervinMetricWalter Davis
446Listed-team regular-season wins677Leads
54.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage51.6%
350-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
9Playoff team seasons11Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Walter Davis leads every available measure below.
George GervinMetricWalter Davis
9Playoff appearances10Leads
59Playoff games78Leads
25Team playoff wins36Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
George GervinMetricWalter Davis
9LeadsAll-Star6
0MVP0
7LeadsAll-NBA2
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
George GervinWalter DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
George GervinNBA seasonWalter Davis
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
No season
Season 11No season
Season 12No season
Season 13No season
Season 14Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.