hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Calbert Cheaney vs. Tom Van Arsdale: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Tom Van Arsdale ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2074Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#971Leads
-1.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1
-2.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8Leads
212.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better79.0Leads
-291 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-397 pts
249.6Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better119.7Leads

Career Impact Rank places Tom Van Arsdale #971 and Calbert Cheaney #2074. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Calbert Cheaney had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/calbert-cheaney/tom-van-arsdale/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCalbert Cheaney224.487 · No. 2,074Tom Van Arsdale91.760 · No. 971

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Calbert Cheaney

224.487 composite · No. 2,074 all-time

Calbert Cheaney's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1691994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2241997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2441993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate212.33350%106.167
Best 5No. 1691994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2241997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2441993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2491996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2542001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate228.00030%68.400
Best 10No. 1691994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2241997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2441993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2491996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2542001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2561995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2621998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2642002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2822003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2921999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate249.60020%49.920

106.167 + 68.400 + 49.920= 224.487

Tom Van Arsdale

91.760 composite · No. 971 all-time

Tom Van Arsdale's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 711966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate79.00050%39.500
Best 5No. 711966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate94.40030%28.320
Best 10No. 711966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1581973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate119.70020%23.940

39.500 + 28.320 + 23.940= 91.760

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2074#971Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better212.379.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better228.094.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better249.6119.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4764Better result for this metric.#4792
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0Better result for this metric.-1.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8-1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.1-1.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7-2.4Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-291 ptsBetter result for this metric.-397 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Games825929
Minutes22,00728,682

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
True shooting percentage50.2%Better result for this metric.48.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.0%Better result for this metric.48.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Field-goal percentage46.6%Better result for this metric.43.1%
Three-point percentage29.8%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage69.1%76.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.4%10.6%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.72.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.8%Better result for this metric.6.2%
Rebounds per game3.24.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%Better result for this metric.0.1%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Calbert Cheaney and Tom Van Arsdale
MetricCalbert CheaneyTom Van Arsdale
Points per game9.515.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Tom Van Arsdale ranks higher in career impact.

Calbert CheaneyMetricTom Van Arsdale
#2074Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#971Leads
-1.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1
-2.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8Leads
-291 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-397 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Calbert CheaneyMetricTom Van Arsdale
442Listed-team regular-season wins1,179Leads
42.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
050-win team seasons14Leads
060-win team seasons14Leads
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Calbert CheaneyMetricTom Van Arsdale
2Playoff appearancesNot available
8Playoff gamesNot available
1Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Calbert CheaneyMetricTom Van Arsdale
Not availableAll-Star3
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Calbert CheaneyTom Van ArsdalePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.