hussEyquation
Menu
Last updated Oct 6, 2026

NBA impact data · 1950–51 to present

1968–69 NBA Player Rankings

Impact Rate and Season Value rankings for the 1968–69 regular season—the NBA season ending in 1969.

Season ending 1969

Who ranks No. 1 in 1968–69?

Wilt Chamberlain ranks No. 1 in hussEyquation Impact Rate for the 1968–69 regular season. This is a model-based impact ranking, not the NBA scoring-leader or standings table. The top ten below compare per-possession impact within this season across 134 qualified players.

The 1968–69 NBA season ended in 1969. If you mean the season that began in 1969, see 1969–70.

  1. #1Wilt ChamberlainLAL100.0
  2. #2Jerry WestLAL99.2
  3. #3Walt FrazierNYK98.5
  4. #4Willis ReedNYK97.7
  5. #5Bill RussellBOS97.0
  6. #6Jerry LucasCIN96.2
  7. #7Elgin BaylorLAL95.5
  8. #8Oscar RobertsonCIN94.7
  9. #9Jeff MullinsSFW94.0
  10. #10Nate ThurmondSFW93.2

1968–69 Impact Rate rankings

A backtested impact estimate from the statistics recorded in that era, with uncertainty ranges.

50 players match Low samples hidden

0 low samples hidden · Backtested within-season impact percentile; rank ranges available. Click a row to inspect.

Swipe for more player stats →

Compare
1100.0LALC3281—45.33,66921.914.70.192——
299.2LALSG3061—39.22,39422.310.80.216——
398.5NYKPG23805536.92,94920.212.70.207——
497.7NYKC26828237.93,10821.414.70.227——
597.0BOSC3477—42.73,29115.210.90.159——
696.2CINPF2874—41.63,07520.69.50.148——
795.5LALSF3476—40.33,06420.78.50.133——
894.7CINPG3079—43.83,46121.812.90.180——
994.0SFWSG2678—37.42,91618.910.00.165——
1093.2SFWC2771—45.23,20818.46.50.098——
1192.5CHIPF3179—36.42,87219.911.60.193——
1291.7SEAPG3182—42.23,46318.49.00.125——
1391.0BOSSG3570—26.01,82017.64.90.128——
1490.2ATLSF2481—35.42,86918.710.10.168——
1589.5BOSSG2882—38.73,17417.07.30.110——
1688.7ATLPF2980—36.62,93015.46.70.110——
1788.0BOSPF3278—32.42,52719.411.30.215——
1887.2CHISG2678—37.72,93914.96.40.104——
1986.5BALC2282—36.22,97018.110.80.175——
2085.7SDRC2382—45.13,69518.99.60.124——
2185.0SDRSF3081—38.63,13016.78.30.127——
2284.2MILSG2580—36.12,88816.77.90.132——
2383.5CHI / MILPG2783—31.52,61618.66.70.123——
2482.7ATLC2972—35.82,57819.18.40.156——
2582SEASG2729—19.656717.61.40.118——
2681.2SEASF3082—32.62,67314.54.60.082——
2780.5BALPF3049—34.11,67117.55.10.148——
2879.7PHISG3282—40.43,31116.99.90.144——
2978.9SFWSF3175—37.12,78215.96.30.109——
3078.2PHOPG2581—40.03,23616.93.60.054——
3177.4SDRPF2478—31.92,48914.55.50.107——
3276.7PHISF2882—33.62,75316.79.80.170——
3375.9SDRPG2979—25.21,98713.13.40.083——
3475.2BALSF2482—33.02,71015.88.50.151——
3574.4BOSSF2882—21.61,77317.57.50.203——
3673.7PHOSG2580—42.43,38815.15.60.080——
3772.9SEAC2482—37.93,10418.67.80.121——
3872.2CHIPG2579—36.42,87414.45.30.088——
3971.4CHISF2580—33.82,70514.75.40.097——
4070.7SDRSG2480—29.32,34614.74.80.098——
4169.9BALSG2480—38.43,07518.48.80.138——
4269.2PHIC3082—28.82,36013.25.90.120——
4368.4ATLSG2781—33.62,72014.56.70.118——
4467.7BALPF3082—26.42,16814.94.50.099——
4566.9MILPF2279—27.92,20712.12.70.058——
4666.2BOSSF3082—26.62,18412.85.40.119——
4765.4DET / PHOC2576—31.02,35413.93.90.079——
4864.7SDRSG2273—18.91,37811.93.40.118——
4963.9PHIPF2582—40.83,34518.79.00.129——
5063.2NYK / DETC29886235.93,15918.010.40.157——