hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Adrian Dantley vs. Dominique Wilkins: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Adrian Dantley ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#57LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#88
+5.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.6Leads
+4.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.6
5.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better11.3
+3,457 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,754 ptsLeads
4LeadsTop-10 impact seasons1

Career Impact Rank places Adrian Dantley #57 and Dominique Wilkins #88. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Dominique Wilkins had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/adrian-dantley/dominique-wilkins/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAdrian Dantley7.987 · No. 57Dominique Wilkins13.087 · No. 88

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Adrian Dantley

7.987 composite · No. 57 all-time

Adrian Dantley's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5.33350%2.667
Best 5No. 41985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7.20030%2.160
Best 10No. 41985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.80020%3.160

2.667 + 2.160 + 3.160= 7.987

Dominique Wilkins

13.087 composite · No. 88 all-time

Dominique Wilkins's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 81992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.33350%5.667
Best 5No. 81992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.80030%3.840
Best 10No. 81992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.90020%3.580

5.667 + 3.840 + 3.580= 13.087

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#57Better result for this metric.#88
Best 3 average finish5.3Better result for this metric.11.3
Best 5 average finish7.2Better result for this metric.12.8
Best 10 average finish15.8Better result for this metric.17.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#64#50Better result for this metric.
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.3+5.6Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+5.0+5.0
Best 5 average impact+4.7Better result for this metric.+4.6
Best 10 average impact+3.7+3.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,457 pts+3,754 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons2Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons4Better result for this metric.1

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Games9551,074
Minutes34,15138,113

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
True shooting percentage61.7%Better result for this metric.53.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile62.5%Better result for this metric.54.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Field-goal percentage54.0%Better result for this metric.46.1%
Three-point percentage17.1%31.9%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage81.8%Better result for this metric.81.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.2%Better result for this metric.13.2%
Assists per game3.0Better result for this metric.2.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.6%9.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.8%10.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.76.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%1.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.2%0.9%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins
MetricAdrian DantleyDominique Wilkins
Points per game24.324.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Adrian Dantley ranks higher in career impact.

Adrian DantleyMetricDominique Wilkins
#57LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#88
+5.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.6Leads
+4.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.6
+3,457 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,754 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Adrian DantleyMetricDominique Wilkins
690LeadsListed-team regular-season wins663
49.5%Listed-team winning percentage51.8%Leads
350-win team seasons5Leads
1Leads60-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Adrian DantleyMetricDominique Wilkins
7Playoff appearances10Leads
73LeadsPlayoff games56
37LeadsTeam playoff wins23
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Adrian DantleyMetricDominique Wilkins
6All-Star9Leads
0MVP0
2All-NBA7Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Adrian DantleyDominique WilkinsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.