hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Andrei Kirilenko vs. Bill Walton: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Andrei Kirilenko ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#48LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#107
+8.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.8
+6.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4
4.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better2.7Leads
+2,937 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,824 pts
5LeadsTop-10 impact seasons4

Career Impact Rank places Andrei Kirilenko #48 and Bill Walton #107. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/andrei-kirilenko/bill-walton/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAndrei Kirilenko7.207 · No. 48Bill Walton15.113 · No. 107

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Andrei Kirilenko

7.207 composite · No. 48 all-time

Andrei Kirilenko's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 32004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4.33350%2.167
Best 5No. 32004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6.40030%1.920
Best 10No. 32004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 152012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.60020%3.120

2.167 + 1.920 + 3.120= 7.207

Bill Walton

15.113 composite · No. 107 all-time

Bill Walton's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 21977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.66750%1.333
Best 5No. 21977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5.60030%1.680
Best 10No. 21977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 247.560.50020%12.100

1.333 + 1.680 + 12.100= 15.113

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 247.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#48Better result for this metric.#107
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better4.32.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better6.45.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.6Better result for this metric.60.5
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#92Better result for this metric.#211
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+8.7Better result for this metric.+7.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.6Better result for this metric.+6.5
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.5Better result for this metric.+5.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.9Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,937 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,824 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons23Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons5Better result for this metric.4

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Games797468
Minutes23,91613,250

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
True shooting percentage57.1%Better result for this metric.55.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile57.7%Better result for this metric.55.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Field-goal percentage47.4%52.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage31.0%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage75.4%Better result for this metric.66.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.8%17.1%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.73.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.4%Better result for this metric.21.1%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.9%19.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.510.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.4%Better result for this metric.1.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.2%Better result for this metric.4.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Andrei Kirilenko and Bill Walton
MetricAndrei KirilenkoBill Walton
Points per game11.813.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Andrei Kirilenko ranks higher in career impact.

Andrei KirilenkoMetricBill Walton
#48LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#107
+8.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.8
+6.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4
+2,937 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,824 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Andrei KirilenkoMetricBill Walton
558LeadsListed-team regular-season wins518
52.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage1.3%
350-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons3Leads
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Andrei KirilenkoMetricBill Walton
7LeadsPlayoff appearances4
55LeadsPlayoff games49
27Team playoff wins44Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Andrei KirilenkoMetricBill Walton
1All-Star2Leads
0MVP1Leads
0All-NBA2Leads
3LeadsAll-Defense2
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Andrei KirilenkoBill WaltonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.