hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Artis Gilmore vs. Bob Lanier: 1981–82 season

hussEyquation1981–82 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Artis Gilmore has the higher model estimate for the 1981–82 season

Impact comparison
+3.9LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.5
#15LeadsSeason impact rank#26
82Games74
2,796Minutes1,986
18.5LeadsPPG13.5
70.2%LeadsTS%59.6%

Artis Gilmore's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +3.9, compared with +2.5 for Bob Lanier. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 1981–82 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Artis Gilmore: 82 games and 2,796 minutes. Bob Lanier: 74 games and 1,986 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

1981–82 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/artis-gilmore/bob-lanier/1981-82

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 1981–82 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.9Better result for this metric.+2.5
Season impact rank#15Better result for this metric.#26

Artis Gilmore: verified lineup window unavailable. Bob Lanier: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Games8274
Minutes2,7961,986

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
True shooting percentage70.2%Better result for this metric.59.6%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Field-goal percentage65.2%Better result for this metric.55.8%
Three-point percentage100.0%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage76.8%Better result for this metric.75.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Assists per game1.73.0Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Rebounds per game10.2Better result for this metric.5.2

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Artis Gilmore and Bob Lanier
MetricArtis GilmoreBob Lanier
Points per game18.5Better result for this metric.13.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Artis Gilmore has the higher model estimate for the 1981–82 season.

Artis GilmoreMetricBob Lanier
+3.9LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.5
#15LeadsSeason impact rank#26

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Artis GilmoreMetricBob Lanier
525Listed-team regular-season wins885Leads
49.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.7%
350-win team seasons10Leads
060-win team seasons7Leads
7Playoff team seasons9Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bob Lanier leads every available measure below.

Artis GilmoreMetricBob Lanier
6Playoff appearances9Leads
42Playoff games67Leads
20Team playoff wins30Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Artis GilmoreMetricBob Lanier
6All-Star8Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
1LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Selected seasons

Era-centered impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Artis GilmoreBob Lanier

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.