hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Artis Gilmore vs. Dan Issel: 1976–77 season

hussEyquation1976–77 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Artis Gilmore has the higher model estimate for the 1976–77 season

Impact comparison
+4.6LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.6
#6LeadsSeason impact rank#21
82Games79
2,877Minutes2,507
18.6PPG22.3Leads
56.6%TS%57.8%Leads

Artis Gilmore's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +4.6, compared with +2.6 for Dan Issel. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 1976–77 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Artis Gilmore: 82 games and 2,877 minutes. Dan Issel: 79 games and 2,507 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

1976–77 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/artis-gilmore/dan-issel/1976-77

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 1976–77 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.6Better result for this metric.+2.6
Season impact rank#6Better result for this metric.#21

Artis Gilmore: verified lineup window unavailable. Dan Issel: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Games8279
Minutes2,8772,507

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
True shooting percentage56.6%57.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Field-goal percentage52.2%Better result for this metric.51.5%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage66.0%79.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Assists per game2.4Better result for this metric.2.2

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Rebounds per game13.0Better result for this metric.8.8

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel
MetricArtis GilmoreDan Issel
Points per game18.622.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Artis Gilmore has the higher model estimate for the 1976–77 season.

Artis GilmoreMetricDan Issel
+4.6LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.6
#6LeadsSeason impact rank#21

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Artis GilmoreMetricDan Issel
525LeadsListed-team regular-season wins393
49.2%Listed-team winning percentage53.3%Leads
3Leads50-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons0
7Playoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Dan Issel leads every available measure below.

Artis GilmoreMetricDan Issel
6Playoff appearances7Leads
42Playoff games53Leads
20Team playoff wins23Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Artis Gilmore leads every available measure below.

Artis GilmoreMetricDan Issel
6LeadsAll-Star1
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
1LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Selected seasons

Era-centered impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Artis GilmoreDan Issel

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.