Bailey Howell
1959–60 to 1970–71 · 12 seasons
NBA player comparison
Bailey Howell vs. David Lee: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Bailey Howell ranks higher in career impact
David Lee
2005–06 to 2016–17 · 12 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#69LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#471
+3.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0
8.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.7
+2,648 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,495 pts
2LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
Career Impact Rank places Bailey Howell #69 and David Lee #471. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBailey Howell10.407 · No. 69David Lee54.433 · No. 471
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Bailey Howell
10.407 composite · No. 69 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 8.333 | 50% | 4.167 |
| Best 5No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 10.400 | 30% | 3.120 |
| Best 10No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.600 | 20% | 3.120 |
4.167 + 3.120 + 3.120= 10.407
David Lee
54.433 composite · No. 471 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 262009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 402006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 43.667 | 50% | 21.833 |
| Best 5No. 262009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 402006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 57.000 | 30% | 17.100 |
| Best 10No. 262009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 402006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 862014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1142010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 77.500 | 20% | 15.500 |
21.833 + 17.100 + 15.500= 54.433
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #69Better result for this metric. | #471 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 8.3Better result for this metric. | 43.7 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 10.4Better result for this metric. | 57.0 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 15.6Better result for this metric. | 77.5 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #117Better result for this metric. | #280 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +3.8Better result for this metric. | +3.1 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +3.0Better result for this metric. | +2.4 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.5Better result for this metric. | +2.0 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.7Better result for this metric. | +1.3 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +2,648 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +1,495 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 2Better result for this metric. | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 950 | 829 |
| Minutes | 30,627 | 24,293 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.4% | 57.7%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 54.9% | 58.3%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 48.0% | 53.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | 3.4% |
| Free-throw percentage | 76.2% | 77.2%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 8.0% | 12.8%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.0 | 2.2Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 13.3% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 17.3% |
| Rebounds per game | 9.9Better result for this metric. | 8.8 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 1.3% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 1.3% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Bailey Howell | David Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 18.7Better result for this metric. | 13.5 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Bailey Howell ranks higher in career impact.
Bailey HowellMetricDavid Lee
#69LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#471
+3.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0
+2,648 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,495 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Bailey HowellMetricDavid Lee
727LeadsListed-team regular-season wins515
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage49.0%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons3
7Leads60-win team seasons2
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons6
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Bailey Howell leads every available measure below.
Bailey HowellMetricDavid Lee
10LeadsPlayoff appearances5
86LeadsPlayoff games43
44LeadsTeam playoff wins34
2LeadsFinals appearances1
2LeadsChampionships1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Bailey Howell leads every available measure below.
Bailey HowellMetricDavid Lee
6LeadsAll-Star2
0MVP0
1All-NBA1
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Bailey HowellDavid LeePeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Bailey HowellNBA seasonDavid Lee
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.