hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bailey Howell vs. Kyle Anderson: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Bailey Howell ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#69LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#382
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6Leads
8.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better33.0
+2,648 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,231 pts
2LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
15.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better76.4

Career Impact Rank places Bailey Howell #69 and Kyle Anderson #382. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Kyle Anderson had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/bailey-howell/kyle-anderson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBailey Howell10.407 · No. 69Kyle Anderson45.820 · No. 382

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bailey Howell

10.407 composite · No. 69 all-time

Bailey Howell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.40030%3.120
Best 10No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.60020%3.120

4.167 + 3.120 + 3.120= 10.407

Kyle Anderson

45.820 composite · No. 382 all-time

Kyle Anderson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 232020–21No. 252017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512022–2333.00050%16.500
Best 5No. 232020–21No. 252017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512022–23No. 622016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 732024–2546.80030%14.040
Best 10No. 232020–21No. 252017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512022–23No. 622016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 732024–25No. 792021–22No. 822015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1002018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1062019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1632025–2676.40020%15.280

16.500 + 14.040 + 15.280= 45.820

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#69Better result for this metric.#382
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.3Better result for this metric.33.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.4Better result for this metric.46.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.6Better result for this metric.76.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#117Better result for this metric.#366
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8+3.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0+3.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+2.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7+1.9Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,648 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,231 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons2Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Games950757
Minutes30,62716,177

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
True shooting percentage54.4%54.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.9%55.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Field-goal percentage48.0%48.0%
Three-point percentageUnavailable34.0%
Free-throw percentage76.2%Better result for this metric.71.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.0%16.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.02.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable13.9%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable11.2%
Rebounds per game9.9Better result for this metric.4.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bailey Howell and Kyle Anderson
MetricBailey HowellKyle Anderson
Points per game18.7Better result for this metric.6.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bailey Howell ranks higher in career impact so far.

Bailey HowellMetricKyle Anderson
#69LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#382
+3.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6Leads
+2,648 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,231 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bailey HowellMetricKyle Anderson
727LeadsListed-team regular-season wins670
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage55.3%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons5
7Leads60-win team seasons2
10Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bailey Howell leads every available measure below.

Bailey HowellMetricKyle Anderson
10LeadsPlayoff appearances9
86LeadsPlayoff games76
44LeadsTeam playoff wins38
2LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bailey HowellMetricKyle Anderson
6All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
1All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bailey HowellKyle AndersonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.