hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob Donham vs. Chris Ford: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Bob Donham ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#321LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#455
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
+0.6LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
#21LeadsBest league finish#27
+343 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+932 ptsLeads
273Games794Leads

Career Impact Rank places Bob Donham #321 and Chris Ford #455. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Chris Ford had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/bob-donham/chris-ford/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBob Donham40.157 · No. 321Chris Ford52.320 · No. 455

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bob Donham

40.157 composite · No. 321 all-time

Bob Donham's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 211951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 311952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.33350%13.667
Best 5No. 211951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 311952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 96.542.10030%12.630
Best 10No. 211951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 311952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 96.569.30020%13.860

13.667 + 12.630 + 13.860= 40.157

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 96.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Chris Ford

52.320 composite · No. 455 all-time

Chris Ford's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 271973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.00050%19.500
Best 5No. 271973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.00030%14.100
Best 10No. 271973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1861980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2191981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate93.60020%18.720

19.500 + 14.100 + 18.720= 52.320

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#321Better result for this metric.#455
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.3Better result for this metric.39.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better42.1Better result for this metric.47.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.3Better result for this metric.93.6
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#957#486Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable+1.0
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-0.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+343 pts+932 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Games273794
Minutes6,37722,043

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
True shooting percentage50.3%Better result for this metric.49.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable49.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Field-goal percentage48.0%Better result for this metric.46.0%
Three-point percentageUnavailable37.5%
Free-throw percentage50.7%73.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.1%
Assists per game2.63.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable14.5%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable5.9%
Rebounds per game3.9Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob Donham and Chris Ford
MetricBob DonhamChris Ford
Points per game6.79.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bob Donham ranks higher in career impact.

Bob DonhamMetricChris Ford
#321LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#455
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0
+343 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+932 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bob DonhamMetricChris Ford
166Listed-team regular-season wins655Leads
59.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.8%
050-win team seasons7Leads
060-win team seasons7Leads
4Playoff team seasons7Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Chris Ford leads every available measure below.

Bob DonhamMetricChris Ford
4Playoff appearances7Leads
17Playoff games58Leads
4Team playoff wins33Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob DonhamMetricChris Ford
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bob DonhamChris FordPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.