hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob Love vs. Mark Olberding: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Bob Love ranks higher in career impact

Bob Love

1966–67 to 1976–77 · 11 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#627LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1303
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8
55.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better114.0
+523 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+261 pts
93.8LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better156.0

Career Impact Rank places Bob Love #627 and Mark Olberding #1303. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bob-love/mark-olberding/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBob Love66.300 · No. 627Mark Olberding127.800 · No. 1,303

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bob Love

66.300 composite · No. 627 all-time

Bob Love's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate55.00050%27.500
Best 5No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.80030%20.040
Best 10No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1081968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate93.80020%18.760

27.500 + 20.040 + 18.760= 66.300

Mark Olberding

127.800 composite · No. 1,303 all-time

Mark Olberding's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1011981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate114.00050%57.000
Best 5No. 1011981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate132.00030%39.600
Best 10No. 1011981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1781976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2131986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate156.00020%31.200

57.000 + 39.600 + 31.200= 127.800

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#627Better result for this metric.#1303
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better55.0Better result for this metric.114.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.8Better result for this metric.132.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better93.8Better result for this metric.156.0
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#757Better result for this metric.#1077
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.-0.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Better result for this metric.-0.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-0.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.4-1.4
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+523 ptsBetter result for this metric.+261 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Games789865
Minutes25,12021,637

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
True shooting percentage48.5%57.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.0%57.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Field-goal percentage42.9%49.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable12.2%
Free-throw percentage80.5%81.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.8%12.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.42.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable19.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.6%11.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.9Better result for this metric.5.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.6%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob Love and Mark Olberding
MetricBob LoveMark Olberding
Points per game17.6Better result for this metric.9.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bob Love ranks higher in career impact.

Bob LoveMetricMark Olberding
#627LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1303
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8
+523 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+261 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bob LoveMetricMark Olberding
1,007LeadsListed-team regular-season wins448
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage49.7%Leads
11Leads50-win team seasons2
11Leads60-win team seasons0
8Playoff team seasons8

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bob LoveMetricMark Olberding
6Playoff appearances8Leads
47Playoff games47
18LeadsTeam playoff wins17
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob LoveMetricMark Olberding
3All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
2All-NBANot available
3All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bob LoveMark OlberdingPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.