hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Chris Kaman vs. Steve Blake: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Steve Blake ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1693Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1489Leads
+0.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
154.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better129.7Leads
+104 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+228 ptsLeads
215.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better201.8Leads

Career Impact Rank places Steve Blake #1489 and Chris Kaman #1693. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Chris Kaman had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/chris-kaman/steve-blake/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChris Kaman175.047 · No. 1,693Steve Blake150.433 · No. 1,489

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chris Kaman

175.047 composite · No. 1,693 all-time

Chris Kaman's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 902007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2022011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate154.33350%77.167
Best 5No. 902007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2022011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2182010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2312009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate182.40030%54.720
Best 10No. 902007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2022011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2182010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2312009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2332008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2352013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2532014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2612006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2642004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate215.80020%43.160

77.167 + 54.720 + 43.160= 175.047

Steve Blake

150.433 composite · No. 1,489 all-time

Steve Blake's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 932008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1192005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate129.66750%64.833
Best 5No. 932008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1192005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1802012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1852009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate150.80030%45.240
Best 10No. 932008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1192005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1802012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1852009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2142013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2362003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2482006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2702010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2962011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate201.80020%40.360

64.833 + 45.240 + 40.360= 150.433

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1693#1489Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better154.3129.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better182.4150.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better215.8201.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1404#1137Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Better result for this metric.+0.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8-0.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3-1.2Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+104 pts+228 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Games735870
Minutes19,64220,823

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
True shooting percentage52.5%Better result for this metric.52.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.6%Better result for this metric.52.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Field-goal percentage48.9%Better result for this metric.40.1%
Three-point percentage4.2%38.3%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage74.3%77.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.1%25.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.34.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.3%Better result for this metric.18.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.6%Better result for this metric.5.1%
Rebounds per game7.6Better result for this metric.2.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%1.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.8%Better result for this metric.0.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chris Kaman and Steve Blake
MetricChris KamanSteve Blake
Points per game11.2Better result for this metric.6.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Steve Blake ranks higher in career impact.

Chris KamanMetricSteve Blake
#1693Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1489Leads
+0.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
+104 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+228 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Steve Blake leads every available measure below.

Chris KamanMetricSteve Blake
439Listed-team regular-season wins654Leads
41.8%Listed-team winning percentage50.5%Leads
150-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons0
3Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Steve Blake leads every available measure below.

Chris KamanMetricSteve Blake
3Playoff appearances9Leads
18Playoff games53Leads
13Team playoff wins20Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Chris KamanMetricSteve Blake
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chris KamanSteve BlakePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.