hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Chris Webber vs. Elgin Baylor: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Elgin Baylor ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#63Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#12Leads
+5.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.4Leads
+5.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.5
7.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better1.3Leads
0Seasons ranked No. 12Leads
+3,519 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+4,809 ptsLeads

Career Impact Rank places Elgin Baylor #12 and Chris Webber #63. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/chris-webber/elgin-baylor/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChris Webber8.840 · No. 63Elgin Baylor2.027 · No. 12

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chris Webber

8.840 composite · No. 63 all-time

Chris Webber's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 62001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7.00050%3.500
Best 5No. 62001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.00030%2.400
Best 10No. 62001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.70020%2.940

3.500 + 2.400 + 2.940= 8.840

Elgin Baylor

2.027 composite · No. 12 all-time

Elgin Baylor's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 11959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1.33350%0.667
Best 5No. 11959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1.80030%0.540
Best 10No. 11959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4.10020%0.820

0.667 + 0.540 + 0.820= 2.027

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#63#12Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better7.01.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.01.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.74.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#59#30Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.9+6.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7+6.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.6Better result for this metric.+5.5
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.7Better result for this metric.+4.3
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,519 pts+4,809 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 102Better result for this metric.
Top-five impact seasons06Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons510Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Games831846
Minutes30,84733,863

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
True shooting percentage51.3%Better result for this metric.49.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.0%Better result for this metric.50.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Field-goal percentage47.9%Better result for this metric.43.1%
Three-point percentage29.9%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage64.9%78.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.7%Better result for this metric.16.7%
Assists per game4.24.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.7%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.5%Unavailable
Rebounds per game9.813.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.9%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chris Webber and Elgin Baylor
MetricChris WebberElgin Baylor
Points per game20.727.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Elgin Baylor ranks higher in career impact.

Chris WebberMetricElgin Baylor
#63Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#12Leads
+5.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.4Leads
+5.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.5
+3,519 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+4,809 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Chris WebberMetricElgin Baylor
764Listed-team regular-season wins894Leads
56.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.6%
750-win team seasons10Leads
160-win team seasons8Leads
11Playoff team seasons14Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Elgin Baylor leads every available measure below.

Chris WebberMetricElgin Baylor
10Playoff appearances12Leads
80Playoff games134Leads
42Team playoff wins76Leads
0Finals appearances8Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Elgin Baylor leads every available measure below.

Chris WebberMetricElgin Baylor
5All-Star11Leads
0MVP0
5All-NBA10Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1Rookie of the Year1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chris WebberElgin BaylorPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.