Clyde Lovellette
1953–54 to 1963–64 · 11 seasons
NBA player comparison
Clyde Lovellette vs. Ed Macauley: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Ed Macauley ranks higher in career impact
Ed Macauley
1950–51 to 1958–59 · 9 seasons
Impact comparison
#73Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#45Leads
+3.0Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.3Leads
+2.4Best 5 average impact+3.7Leads
8.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better1.0Leads
0Seasons ranked No. 13Leads
+1,701 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,034 ptsLeads
Career Impact Rank places Ed Macauley #45 and Clyde Lovellette #73. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedClyde Lovellette10.860 · No. 73Ed Macauley6.380 · No. 45
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Clyde Lovellette
10.860 composite · No. 73 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 71957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 8.000 | 50% | 4.000 |
| Best 5No. 71957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 9.000 | 30% | 2.700 |
| Best 10No. 71957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 20.800 | 20% | 4.160 |
4.000 + 2.700 + 4.160= 10.860
Ed Macauley
6.380 composite · No. 45 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 11950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 11952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 1.000 | 50% | 0.500 |
| Best 5No. 11950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 11952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 3.400 | 30% | 1.020 |
| Best 10No. 11950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 11952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 82.5 | 24.300 | 20% | 4.860 |
0.500 + 1.020 + 4.860= 6.380
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 82.5, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #73 | #45Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 8.0 | 1.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 9.0 | 3.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 20.8Better result for this metric. | 24.3 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #236 | #174Better result for this metric. |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +3.0 | +5.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average impact | +2.6 | +4.6Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average impact | +2.4 | +3.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average impact | +1.3 | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +1,701 pts | +2,034 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 3Better result for this metric. |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 3Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 4 | 5Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 704 | 574 |
| Minutes | 19,075 | 20,806 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 49.1% | 52.6%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 50.5% | Unavailable |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.3%Better result for this metric. | 44.0% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 75.7% | 76.6%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 1.6 | 3.3Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 9.5Better result for this metric. | 7.5 |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Clyde Lovellette | Ed Macauley |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 17.0 | 17.7Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Ed Macauley ranks higher in career impact.
Clyde LovelletteMetricEd Macauley
#73Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#45Leads
+3.0Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.3Leads
+2.4Best 5 average impact+3.7Leads
+1,701 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,034 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Clyde Lovellette leads every available measure below.
Clyde LovelletteMetricEd Macauley
478LeadsListed-team regular-season wins365
57.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage57.2%
3Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons9
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Clyde Lovellette leads every available measure below.
Clyde LovelletteMetricEd Macauley
10LeadsPlayoff appearances8
69LeadsPlayoff games47
43LeadsTeam playoff wins24
5LeadsFinals appearances2
3LeadsChampionships1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Ed Macauley leads every available measure below.
Clyde LovelletteMetricEd Macauley
4All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA4Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Clyde LovelletteEd MacauleyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Clyde LovelletteNBA seasonEd Macauley
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
No season
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.