hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Connie Hawkins vs. John Havlicek: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

John Havlicek ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#174Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#47Leads
+3.4Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.1Leads
+2.8Best 5 average impact+3.5Leads
9.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better5.3Leads
+1,826 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+4,586 ptsLeads
2Top-10 impact seasons5Leads

Career Impact Rank places John Havlicek #47 and Connie Hawkins #174. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/connie-hawkins/john-havlicek/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedConnie Hawkins22.500 · No. 174John Havlicek6.987 · No. 47

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Connie Hawkins

22.500 composite · No. 174 all-time

Connie Hawkins's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.00050%4.500
Best 5No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.60030%3.780
Best 10No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 17471.10020%14.220

4.500 + 3.780 + 14.220= 22.500

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.

John Havlicek

6.987 composite · No. 47 all-time

John Havlicek's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 51970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5.33350%2.667
Best 5No. 51970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7.20030%2.160
Best 10No. 51970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.80020%2.160

2.667 + 2.160 + 2.160= 6.987

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#174#47Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish9.05.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish12.67.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish71.110.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#210#34Better result for this metric.
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.4+4.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+3.2+4.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+2.8+3.5Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impactUnavailable+2.6
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,826 pts+4,586 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons02Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons25Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Games4991,270
Minutes17,23446,471

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
True shooting percentage53.5%Better result for this metric.49.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.5%Better result for this metric.50.0%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Field-goal percentage46.7%Better result for this metric.43.9%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage78.5%81.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.5%20.6%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game4.14.8Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.6%Better result for this metric.8.0%
Rebounds per game8.0Better result for this metric.6.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Connie Hawkins and John Havlicek
MetricConnie HawkinsJohn Havlicek
Points per game16.520.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

John Havlicek ranks higher in career impact.

Connie HawkinsMetricJohn Havlicek
#174Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#47Leads
+3.4Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.1Leads
+2.8Best 5 average impact+3.5Leads
+1,826 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+4,586 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

John Havlicek leads every available measure below.

Connie HawkinsMetricJohn Havlicek
656Listed-team regular-season wins1,172Leads
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage0.5%Leads
850-win team seasons14Leads
860-win team seasons12Leads
2Playoff team seasons13Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

John Havlicek leads every available measure below.

Connie HawkinsMetricJohn Havlicek
2Playoff appearances13Leads
12Playoff games172Leads
4Team playoff wins110Leads
0Finals appearances8Leads
0Championships8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

John Havlicek leads every available measure below.

Connie HawkinsMetricJohn Havlicek
4All-Star13Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA11Leads
0All-Defense8Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Connie HawkinsJohn HavlicekPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.