hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Craig Hodges vs. Darrell Griffith: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Darrell Griffith ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1087Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#945Leads
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+0.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3Leads
83.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.0Leads
+225 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+544 ptsLeads
154.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.6Leads

Career Impact Rank places Darrell Griffith #945 and Craig Hodges #1087. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/craig-hodges/darrell-griffith/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCraig Hodges102.787 · No. 1,087Darrell Griffith90.120 · No. 945

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Craig Hodges

102.787 composite · No. 1,087 all-time

Craig Hodges's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 671988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate83.33350%41.667
Best 5No. 671988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate100.80030%30.240
Best 10No. 671988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2251982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2471983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2521991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate154.40020%30.880

41.667 + 30.240 + 30.880= 102.787

Darrell Griffith

90.120 composite · No. 945 all-time

Darrell Griffith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.00050%33.500
Best 5No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1531989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate91.00030%27.300
Best 10No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1531989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1771988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1881987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2021980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2741990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate146.60020%29.320

33.500 + 27.300 + 29.320= 90.120

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1087#945Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better83.367.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better100.891.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better154.4146.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1144#736Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1+0.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3-1.1Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+225 pts+544 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Games695765
Minutes15,07721,403

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
True shooting percentage54.2%Better result for this metric.50.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.1%Better result for this metric.50.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Field-goal percentage46.1%46.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage40.0%Better result for this metric.33.2%
Free-throw percentage82.8%Better result for this metric.70.7%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.4%Better result for this metric.11.5%
Assists per game2.5Better result for this metric.2.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.0%11.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.4%6.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.33.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%2.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%0.6%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Craig Hodges and Darrell Griffith
MetricCraig HodgesDarrell Griffith
Points per game8.516.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Darrell Griffith ranks higher in career impact.

Craig HodgesMetricDarrell Griffith
#1087Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#945Leads
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+0.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3Leads
+225 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+544 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Craig Hodges leads every available measure below.

Craig HodgesMetricDarrell Griffith
576LeadsListed-team regular-season wins420
58.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage51.2%
7Leads50-win team seasons3
2Leads60-win team seasons0
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Craig Hodges leads every available measure below.

Craig HodgesMetricDarrell Griffith
7LeadsPlayoff appearances6
101LeadsPlayoff games37
65LeadsTeam playoff wins17
2LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Craig HodgesMetricDarrell Griffith
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Craig HodgesDarrell GriffithPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.