hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Darrell Armstrong vs. Mike Conley: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Mike Conley ranks higher in career impact so far

Mike Conley

2007–08 to 2025–26 · 19 seasons · active

Impact comparison
#190Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#119Leads
+7.4LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.0
+4.1Best 5 average impact+5.0Leads
14.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better10.7Leads
1LeadsSeasons ranked No. 10
+1,713 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,010 ptsLeads

Career Impact Rank places Mike Conley #119 and Darrell Armstrong #190. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Darrell Armstrong had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/darrell-armstrong/mike-conley/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDarrell Armstrong25.080 · No. 190Mike Conley16.313 · No. 119

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Darrell Armstrong

25.080 composite · No. 190 all-time

Darrell Armstrong's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 11998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.00050%7.000
Best 5No. 11998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 392001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate22.80030%6.840
Best 10No. 11998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 392001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 412006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1872004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate56.20020%11.240

7.000 + 6.840 + 11.240= 25.080

Mike Conley

16.313 composite · No. 119 all-time

Mike Conley's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 102012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.66750%5.333
Best 5No. 102012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.40030%4.320
Best 10No. 102012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 402011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 552020–21No. 652010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652023–2433.30020%6.660

5.333 + 4.320 + 6.660= 16.313

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#190#119Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish14.010.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish22.814.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish56.233.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#234#87Better result for this metric.
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.4Better result for this metric.+7.0
Best 3 average impact+5.2+5.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+4.1+5.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impact+2.6+3.7Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,713 pts+3,010 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 11Better result for this metric.0
Top-five impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons12Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Games8401,226
Minutes19,91537,588

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
True shooting percentage53.2%55.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.7%56.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Field-goal percentage40.9%43.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage33.4%38.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage87.1%Better result for this metric.82.6%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.1%30.5%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game4.05.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.7%12.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.4%Better result for this metric.5.4%
Rebounds per game2.72.9Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.0%Better result for this metric.2.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%0.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Darrell Armstrong and Mike Conley
MetricDarrell ArmstrongMike Conley
Points per game9.213.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Mike Conley ranks higher in career impact so far.

Darrell ArmstrongMetricMike Conley
#190Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#119Leads
+7.4LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.0
+4.1Best 5 average impact+5.0Leads
+1,713 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,010 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Darrell ArmstrongMetricMike Conley
652Listed-team regular-season wins852Leads
54.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.1%
450-win team seasons5Leads
2Leads60-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons14Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Darrell ArmstrongMetricMike Conley
8Playoff appearances13Leads
51Playoff games120Leads
31Team playoff wins65Leads
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Mike Conley leads every available measure below.

Darrell ArmstrongMetricMike Conley
0All-Star1Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense1Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Darrell ArmstrongMike ConleyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.