hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dave Bing vs. Earl Monroe: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Earl Monroe ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Dave Bing

Dave Bing

1966–67 to 1977–78 · 12 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#290Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#265Leads
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
24.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.7
+1,461 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,771 ptsLeads
63.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.8Leads

Career Impact Rank places Earl Monroe #265 and Dave Bing #290. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Dave Bing had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/dave-bing/earl-monroe/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDave Bing36.747 · No. 290Earl Monroe33.853 · No. 265

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dave Bing

36.747 composite · No. 290 all-time

Dave Bing's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.33350%12.167
Best 5No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.40030%11.820
Best 10No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 791975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1291976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.80020%12.760

12.167 + 11.820 + 12.760= 36.747

Earl Monroe

33.853 composite · No. 265 all-time

Earl Monroe's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.66750%13.833
Best 5No. 141967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.20030%10.260
Best 10No. 141967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.80020%9.760

13.833 + 10.260 + 9.760= 33.853

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#290#265Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.3Better result for this metric.27.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.434.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better63.848.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#296#221Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+1.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.7Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,461 pts+1,771 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Games901926
Minutes32,76929,636

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
True shooting percentage50.2%51.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.2%52.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Field-goal percentage44.1%46.4%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage77.5%80.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile24.7%Better result for this metric.17.4%
Assists per game6.0Better result for this metric.3.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable12.5%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.8%Better result for this metric.4.7%
Rebounds per game3.8Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dave Bing and Earl Monroe
MetricDave BingEarl Monroe
Points per game20.3Better result for this metric.18.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Earl Monroe ranks higher in career impact.

Dave BingMetricEarl Monroe
#290Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#265Leads
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+1,461 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,771 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Earl Monroe leads every available measure below.

Dave BingMetricEarl Monroe
899Listed-team regular-season wins973Leads
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage0.5%
1050-win team seasons10
1060-win team seasons10
5Playoff team seasons9Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Earl Monroe leads every available measure below.

Dave BingMetricEarl Monroe
5Playoff appearances8Leads
31Playoff games82Leads
13Team playoff wins40Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Dave Bing leads every available measure below.

Dave BingMetricEarl Monroe
7LeadsAll-Star4
0MVP0
3LeadsAll-NBA1
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1Rookie of the Year1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dave BingEarl MonroePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.