hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dave Budd vs. Herbert Jones: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Dave Budd ranks higher in career impact so far

Dave Budd

1960–61 to 1964–65 · 5 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#324LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1863
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
-0.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9
31.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better164.0
+231 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+248 ptsLeads
65.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better290.3

Career Impact Rank places Dave Budd #324 and Herbert Jones #1863. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Herbert Jones had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/dave-budd/herbert-jones/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDave Budd40.447 · No. 324Herbert Jones198.440 · No. 1,863

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dave Budd

40.447 composite · No. 324 all-time

Dave Budd's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 241962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate31.33350%15.667
Best 5No. 241962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.20030%11.760
Best 10No. 241962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 9165.10020%13.020

15.667 + 11.760 + 13.020= 40.447

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 91, this player's stored replacement finish.

Herbert Jones

198.440 composite · No. 1,863 all-time

Herbert Jones's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1342023–24No. 1712021–22No. 1872022–23164.00050%82.000
Best 5No. 1342023–24No. 1712021–22No. 1872022–23No. 1872025–26No. 2942024–25194.60030%58.380
Best 10No. 1342023–24No. 1712021–22No. 1872022–23No. 1872025–26No. 2942024–255 open slots × No. 386290.30020%58.060

82.000 + 58.380 + 58.060= 198.440

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 386, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#324Better result for this metric.#1863
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better31.3Better result for this metric.164.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.2Better result for this metric.194.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better65.1Better result for this metric.290.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1129#1099Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Better result for this metric.-0.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6Better result for this metric.-0.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+231 pts+248 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Games353296
Minutes6,3898,843

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
True shooting percentage50.8%56.9%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.4%56.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Field-goal percentage46.0%Better result for this metric.45.8%
Three-point percentageUnavailable35.0%
Free-throw percentage68.2%82.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.6%11.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.02.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable13.5%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable6.8%
Rebounds per game4.6Better result for this metric.3.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.0%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dave Budd and Herbert Jones
MetricDave BuddHerbert Jones
Points per game7.19.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Dave Budd ranks higher in career impact so far.

Dave BuddMetricHerbert Jones
#324LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1863
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
-0.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9
+231 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+248 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dave BuddMetricHerbert Jones
173Listed-team regular-season wins174Leads
0.9%Listed-team winning percentage42.4%Leads
1Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
0Playoff team seasons2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dave BuddMetricHerbert Jones
Not availablePlayoff appearances2
Not availablePlayoff games10
Not availableTeam playoff wins2
Not availableFinals appearances0
Not availableChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dave BuddMetricHerbert Jones
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense1
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dave BuddHerbert JonesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.