Fat Lever
1982–83 to 1993–94 · 11 seasons
NBA player comparison
Fat Lever vs. Gus Williams: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Gus Williams ranks higher in career impact
Gus Williams
1975–76 to 1986–87 · 11 seasons
Impact comparison
#66Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#60Leads
+6.7LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.7
+5.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.8
5.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better3.7Leads
+3,267 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,022 pts
22.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better23.3
Career Impact Rank places Gus Williams #60 and Fat Lever #66. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Fat Lever had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedFat Lever9.887 · No. 66Gus Williams8.413 · No. 60
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Fat Lever
9.887 composite · No. 66 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.333 | 50% | 2.667 |
| Best 5No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 9.000 | 30% | 2.700 |
| Best 10No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 22.600 | 20% | 4.520 |
2.667 + 2.700 + 4.520= 9.887
Gus Williams
8.413 composite · No. 60 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 31978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 3.667 | 50% | 1.833 |
| Best 5No. 31978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 6.400 | 30% | 1.920 |
| Best 10No. 31978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 23.300 | 20% | 4.660 |
1.833 + 1.920 + 4.660= 8.413
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #66 | #60Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 5.3 | 3.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 9.0 | 6.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 22.6Better result for this metric. | 23.3 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #74Better result for this metric. | #84 |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +6.7Better result for this metric. | +5.7 |
| Best 3 average impact | +6.4Better result for this metric. | +5.4 |
| Best 5 average impact | +5.7Better result for this metric. | +4.8 |
| Best 10 average impact | +3.9Better result for this metric. | +3.5 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +3,267 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +3,022 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 1 | 3Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 4 | 4 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 752 | 825 |
| Minutes | 23,814 | 25,645 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 49.6% | 50.5%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 48.9% | 50.3%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.7% | 46.1%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 31.0%Better result for this metric. | 23.8% |
| Free-throw percentage | 77.1%Better result for this metric. | 75.6% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 25.6% | 26.3%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 6.2Better result for this metric. | 5.6 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.4% | 11.7%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.7%Better result for this metric. | 4.6% |
| Rebounds per game | 6.0Better result for this metric. | 2.7 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 3.2%Better result for this metric. | 3.0% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.5% | 0.6%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Gus Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 13.9 | 17.1Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Gus Williams ranks higher in career impact.
Fat LeverMetricGus Williams
#66Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#60Leads
+6.7LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.7
+5.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.8
+3,267 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,022 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Fat LeverMetricGus Williams
434Listed-team regular-season wins561Leads
48.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage2.7%
250-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
8Playoff team seasons11Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Gus Williams leads every available measure below.
Fat LeverMetricGus Williams
8Playoff appearances10Leads
48Playoff games99Leads
23Team playoff wins52Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Fat LeverMetricGus Williams
2All-Star2
0MVP0
1All-NBA2Leads
1LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Fat LeverGus WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Fat LeverNBA seasonGus Williams
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.