
Gary Payton
1990–91 to 2006–07 · 17 seasons
NBA player comparison

1990–91 to 2006–07 · 17 seasons

1994–95 to 2012–13 · 19 seasons
Career Impact Rank places Jason Kidd #44 and Gary Payton #62. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Gary Payton had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
8.513 composite · No. 62 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 31999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.667 | 50% | 2.833 |
| Best 5No. 31999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 8.800 | 30% | 2.640 |
| Best 10No. 31999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.200 | 20% | 3.040 |
2.833 + 2.640 + 3.040= 8.513
6.120 composite · No. 44 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.000 | 50% | 2.500 |
| Best 5No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 82004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 6.400 | 30% | 1.920 |
| Best 10No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 82004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 8.500 | 20% | 1.700 |
2.500 + 1.920 + 1.700= 6.120
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #62 | #44Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 5.7 | 5.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 8.8 | 6.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 15.2 | 8.5Better result for this metric. |
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #33 | #17Better result for this metric. |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +7.1Better result for this metric. | +6.8 |
| Best 3 average impact | +6.0 | +6.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average impact | +5.6 | +6.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average impact | +4.7 | +5.7Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +4,652 pts | +6,267 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 1 | 2Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 3 | 8Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,335 | 1,391 |
| Minutes | 47,117 | 50,111 |
3 · Individual skills
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 52.8%Better result for this metric. | 50.7% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 53.4%Better result for this metric. | 51.6% |
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 46.6%Better result for this metric. | 40.0% |
| Three-point percentage | 31.7% | 34.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 72.9% | 78.5%Better result for this metric. |
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 35.6% | 41.2%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 6.7 | 8.7Better result for this metric. |
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.0%Better result for this metric. | 17.5% |
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 6.7% | 10.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 3.9 | 6.3Better result for this metric. |
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.5% | 0.6%Better result for this metric. |
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Gary Payton | Jason Kidd |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 16.3Better result for this metric. | 12.6 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Jason Kidd ranks higher in career impact.
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Jason Kidd leads every available measure below.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.