Grant Hill
2009–10
NBA player comparison
Grant Hill vs. Paul Pierce: 2009–10 season
Regular-season verdict
Paul Pierce has the higher model estimate for the 2009–10 season
Paul Pierce
2009–10
Impact comparison
-1.3Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.7Leads
#209Season impact rank#30Leads
81Games71
2,430Minutes2,411
11.3PPG18.3Leads
56.1%TS%61.3%Leads
Paul Pierce's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +2.7, compared with -1.3 for Grant Hill. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2009–10 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Grant Hill: 81 games and 2,430 minutes. Paul Pierce: 71 games and 2,411 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 2009–10 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | -1.3 | +2.7Better result for this metric. |
| Season impact rank | #209 | #30Better result for this metric. |
Grant Hill: verified lineup window unavailable. Paul Pierce: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 81 | 71 |
| Minutes | 2,430 | 2,411 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 56.1% | 61.3%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 47.8%Better result for this metric. | 47.2% |
| Three-point percentage | 43.8%Better result for this metric. | 41.4% |
| Free-throw percentage | 81.7% | 85.2%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 2.4 | 3.1Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 5.5Better result for this metric. | 4.4 |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Grant Hill | Paul Pierce |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 11.3 | 18.3Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Paul Pierce has the higher model estimate for the 2009–10 season.
Grant HillMetricPaul Pierce
-1.3Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.7Leads
#209Season impact rank#30Leads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Paul Pierce leads every available measure below.
Grant HillMetricPaul Pierce
761Listed-team regular-season wins829Leads
53.3%Listed-team winning percentage54.9%Leads
450-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons2Leads
11Playoff team seasons14Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Paul Pierce leads every available measure below.
Grant HillMetricPaul Pierce
8Playoff appearances14Leads
39Playoff games170Leads
17Team playoff wins88Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Grant HillMetricPaul Pierce
7All-Star10Leads
0MVP0
5LeadsAll-NBA4
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Selected seasons
Era-centered impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Grant HillPaul Pierce
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average