Jack George
1953–54 to 1960–61 · 8 seasons
NBA player comparison
Jack George vs. Phil Ford: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Jack George ranks higher in career impact
Phil Ford
1978–79 to 1984–85 · 7 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#258LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1070
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Leads
+0.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
27.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.3
+574 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+390 pts
50.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better181.0
Career Impact Rank places Jack George #258 and Phil Ford #1070. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Phil Ford had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJack George33.333 · No. 258Phil Ford101.507 · No. 1,070
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jack George
33.333 composite · No. 258 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 221953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 27.667 | 50% | 13.833 |
| Best 5No. 221953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 31.600 | 30% | 9.480 |
| Best 10No. 221953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 80 | 50.100 | 20% | 10.020 |
13.833 + 9.480 + 10.020= 33.333
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 80, this player's stored replacement finish.
Phil Ford
101.507 composite · No. 1,070 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 531979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 59.333 | 50% | 29.667 |
| Best 5No. 531979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2151982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 118.800 | 30% | 35.640 |
| Best 10No. 531979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2151982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2161981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 250 | 181.000 | 20% | 36.200 |
29.667 + 35.640 + 36.200= 101.507
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 250, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #258Better result for this metric. | #1070 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 27.7Better result for this metric. | 59.3 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 31.6Better result for this metric. | 118.8 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 50.1Better result for this metric. | 181.0 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #717Better result for this metric. | #905 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.0 | +1.1Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.5 | +1.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.1Better result for this metric. | -0.5 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +574 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +390 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 506 | 482 |
| Minutes | 15,860 | 13,503 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 42.4% | 53.1%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 44.3% | 53.1%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 36.4% | 46.7%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | 21.0% |
| Free-throw percentage | 70.4% | 82.0%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 29.8% |
| Assists per game | 4.3 | 6.4Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 20.3% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 3.4% |
| Rebounds per game | 4.2Better result for this metric. | 1.8 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 2.0% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 0.1% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jack George | Phil Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 10.2 | 11.6Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Jack George ranks higher in career impact.
Jack GeorgeMetricPhil Ford
#258LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1070
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Leads
+0.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
+574 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+390 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Phil Ford leads every available measure below.
Jack GeorgeMetricPhil Ford
301Listed-team regular-season wins342Leads
45.7%Listed-team winning percentage52.1%Leads
050-win team seasons1Leads
060-win team seasons0
4Playoff team seasons6Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jack GeorgeMetricPhil Ford
4Playoff appearances4
22LeadsPlayoff games15
10Team playoff wins14Leads
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jack GeorgeMetricPhil Ford
2LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
1All-NBA1
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jack GeorgePhil FordPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jack GeorgeNBA seasonPhil Ford
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.