
Jason Kidd
2001–02
NBA player comparison

2001–02

2001–02
John Stockton's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +5.4, compared with +5.2 for Jason Kidd. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2001–02 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Jason Kidd: 82 games and 3,056 minutes. John Stockton: 82 games and 2,566 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 2001–02 season
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +5.2 | +5.4Better result for this metric. |
| Season impact rank | #9 | #8Better result for this metric. |
Jason Kidd: verified lineup window unavailable. John Stockton: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 82 | 82 |
| Minutes | 3,056 | 2,566 |
3 · Individual skills
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 48.4% | 60.1%Better result for this metric. |
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 39.1% | 51.7%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 32.1% | 32.1% |
| Free-throw percentage | 81.4% | 85.7%Better result for this metric. |
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 9.9Better result for this metric. | 8.2 |
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 7.3Better result for this metric. | 3.2 |
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | John Stockton |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 14.7Better result for this metric. | 13.4 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
John Stockton has the higher model estimate for the 2001–02 season.
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
John Stockton leads every available measure below.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Selected seasons
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average