John Stockton
1984–85 to 2002–03 · 19 seasons
NBA player comparison
John Stockton vs. Steve Nash: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
John Stockton ranks higher in career impact
Steve Nash
1996–97 to 2013–14 · 18 seasons
Impact comparison
#21LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#189
+8.9LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7
+8.2LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.8
2.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better21.0
+7,983 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,076 pts
16LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
Career Impact Rank places John Stockton #21 and Steve Nash #189. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJohn Stockton2.893 · No. 21Steve Nash24.840 · No. 189
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
John Stockton
2.893 composite · No. 21 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 21987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 2.667 | 50% | 1.333 |
| Best 5No. 21987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 2.800 | 30% | 0.840 |
| Best 10No. 21987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 3.600 | 20% | 0.720 |
1.333 + 0.840 + 0.720= 2.893
Steve Nash
24.840 composite · No. 189 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 182006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 21.000 | 50% | 10.500 |
| Best 5No. 182006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 24.800 | 30% | 7.440 |
| Best 10No. 182006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 572000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 34.500 | 20% | 6.900 |
10.500 + 7.440 + 6.900= 24.840
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #21Better result for this metric. | #189 |
| Best 3 average finish | 2.7Better result for this metric. | 21.0 |
| Best 5 average finish | 2.8Better result for this metric. | 24.8 |
| Best 10 average finish | 3.6Better result for this metric. | 34.5 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #5Better result for this metric. | #81 |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +8.9Better result for this metric. | +4.7 |
| Best 3 average impact | +8.4Better result for this metric. | +4.3 |
| Best 5 average impact | +8.2Better result for this metric. | +3.8 |
| Best 10 average impact | +7.5Better result for this metric. | +3.1 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +7,983 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +3,076 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 9Better result for this metric. | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 16Better result for this metric. | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,504 | 1,217 |
| Minutes | 47,764 | 38,069 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 60.8%Better result for this metric. | 60.5% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 60.8% | 61.4%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 51.5%Better result for this metric. | 49.0% |
| Three-point percentage | 38.4% | 42.8%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 82.6% | 90.4%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 52.9%Better result for this metric. | 45.9% |
| Assists per game | 10.5Better result for this metric. | 8.5 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 20.7% | 20.0%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 4.7% | 5.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 2.7 | 3.0Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 3.8%Better result for this metric. | 1.1% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.4%Better result for this metric. | 0.2% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | John Stockton | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 13.1 | 14.3Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
John Stockton ranks higher in career impact.
John StocktonMetricSteve Nash
#21LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#189
+8.9LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7
+8.2LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.8
+7,983 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,076 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
John Stockton leads every available measure below.
John StocktonMetricSteve Nash
966LeadsListed-team regular-season wins854
63.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage59.8%
11Leads50-win team seasons10
360-win team seasons3
19LeadsPlayoff team seasons12
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
John Stockton leads every available measure below.
John StocktonMetricSteve Nash
19LeadsPlayoff appearances12
182LeadsPlayoff games120
89LeadsTeam playoff wins58
2LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
John StocktonMetricSteve Nash
10LeadsAll-Star8
0MVP2Leads
11LeadsAll-NBA7
5LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
John StocktonSteve NashPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
John StocktonNBA seasonSteve Nash
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
Season 15
Season 16
Season 17
Season 18
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.