hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jon Barry vs. Steve Mix: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Steve Mix ranks higher in career impact

Jon Barry

1992–93 to 2005–06 · 14 seasons

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Steve Mix

Steve Mix

1969–70 to 1982–83 · 13 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#225Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#158Leads
+4.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.6
+3.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
22.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.0Leads
+1,046 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,539 ptsLeads
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Steve Mix #158 and Jon Barry #225. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jon Barry had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jon-barry/steve-mix/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJon Barry29.553 · No. 225Steve Mix20.520 · No. 158

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jon Barry

29.553 composite · No. 225 all-time

Jon Barry's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 192002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate22.66750%11.333
Best 5No. 192002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.20030%8.160
Best 10No. 192002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 562003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1312000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.30020%10.060

11.333 + 8.160 + 10.060= 29.553

Steve Mix

20.520 composite · No. 158 all-time

Steve Mix's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.00050%7.500
Best 5No. 101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.20030%5.760
Best 10No. 101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.30020%7.260

7.500 + 5.760 + 7.260= 20.520

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#225#158Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better22.715.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.219.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.336.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#439#266Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Better result for this metric.+3.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7Better result for this metric.+3.0
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Better result for this metric.+2.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3Better result for this metric.+1.8
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,046 pts+1,539 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Games821787
Minutes13,88018,827

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
True shooting percentage57.2%Better result for this metric.55.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.1%Better result for this metric.56.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Field-goal percentage43.4%49.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage39.2%Better result for this metric.28.6%
Free-throw percentage84.8%Better result for this metric.80.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.4%Better result for this metric.11.2%
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.5%13.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%10.9%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.85.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.7%Better result for this metric.2.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jon Barry and Steve Mix
MetricJon BarrySteve Mix
Points per game5.710.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Steve Mix ranks higher in career impact.

Jon BarryMetricSteve Mix
#225Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#158Leads
+4.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.6
+3.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
+1,046 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,539 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jon BarryMetricSteve Mix
602Listed-team regular-season wins932Leads
50.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.8%
650-win team seasons13Leads
160-win team seasons7Leads
9Playoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jon BarryMetricSteve Mix
9LeadsPlayoff appearances8
62Playoff games89Leads
34Team playoff wins63Leads
0Finals appearances4Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jon BarryMetricSteve Mix
Not availableAll-Star1
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jon BarrySteve MixPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.