hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Larry Costello vs. Mo Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Larry Costello ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#194LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#986
+0.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
22.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better74.3
+973 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+751 pts
36.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better139.3

Career Impact Rank places Larry Costello #194 and Mo Williams #986. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Mo Williams had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/larry-costello/mo-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedLarry Costello25.540 · No. 194Mo Williams92.927 · No. 986

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Larry Costello

25.540 composite · No. 194 all-time

Larry Costello's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 201957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate22.00050%11.000
Best 5No. 201957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.40030%7.320
Best 10No. 201957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.10020%7.220

11.000 + 7.320 + 7.220= 25.540

Mo Williams

92.927 composite · No. 986 all-time

Mo Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 582008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 772009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 882007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate74.33350%37.167
Best 5No. 582008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 772009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 882007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1272014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate93.00030%27.900
Best 10No. 582008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 772009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 882007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1272014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1312006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2082010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2112012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate139.30020%27.860

37.167 + 27.900 + 27.860= 92.927

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#194Better result for this metric.#986
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better22.0Better result for this metric.74.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.4Better result for this metric.93.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.1Better result for this metric.139.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#466Better result for this metric.#589
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9+1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4+0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3+0.0Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+973 ptsBetter result for this metric.+751 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Games706818
Minutes21,19823,872

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
True shooting percentage51.7%53.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.3%53.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Field-goal percentage43.8%Better result for this metric.43.4%
Three-point percentageUnavailable37.8%
Free-throw percentage84.1%87.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.6%29.1%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game4.64.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable15.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable5.5%
Rebounds per game3.8Better result for this metric.2.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Larry Costello and Mo Williams
MetricLarry CostelloMo Williams
Points per game12.213.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Larry Costello ranks higher in career impact.

Larry CostelloMetricMo Williams
#194LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#986
+0.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
+973 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+751 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Larry CostelloMetricMo Williams
595LeadsListed-team regular-season wins587
1.0%Listed-team winning percentage48.4%Leads
350-win team seasons4Leads
3Leads60-win team seasons2
11LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Larry CostelloMetricMo Williams
10LeadsPlayoff appearances6
52Playoff games62Leads
34Team playoff wins42Leads
1Finals appearances1
1Championships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Larry Costello leads every available measure below.

Larry CostelloMetricMo Williams
6LeadsAll-Star1
0MVP0
1LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Larry CostelloMo WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.