hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Mark Jackson vs. Rajon Rondo: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Mark Jackson ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#229LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#303
+3.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4Leads
25.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.7
+2,557 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,749 pts
46.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.2
+2.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6

Career Impact Rank places Mark Jackson #229 and Rajon Rondo #303. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rajon Rondo had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/mark-jackson/rajon-rondo/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMark Jackson30.200 · No. 229Rajon Rondo38.413 · No. 303

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Mark Jackson

30.200 composite · No. 229 all-time

Mark Jackson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.00050%12.500
Best 5No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.20030%8.460
Best 10No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate46.20020%9.240

12.500 + 8.460 + 9.240= 30.200

Rajon Rondo

38.413 composite · No. 303 all-time

Rajon Rondo's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 182009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.66750%13.333
Best 5No. 182009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 542011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate38.80030%11.640
Best 10No. 182009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 542011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 892013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1082016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1172006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.20020%13.440

13.333 + 11.640 + 13.440= 38.413

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#229Better result for this metric.#303
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.0Better result for this metric.26.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.2Better result for this metric.38.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better46.2Better result for this metric.67.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#124Better result for this metric.#227
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1+3.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8+2.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6+2.6
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0Better result for this metric.+1.7
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,557 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,749 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Games1,296957
Minutes39,12128,571

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
True shooting percentage52.2%Better result for this metric.50.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.2%Better result for this metric.49.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Field-goal percentage44.7%45.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage33.2%Better result for this metric.32.4%
Free-throw percentage77.0%Better result for this metric.61.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile40.3%42.0%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game8.0Better result for this metric.7.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.6%Better result for this metric.21.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.4%8.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.84.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.1%2.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.2%0.3%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Mark Jackson and Rajon Rondo
MetricMark JacksonRajon Rondo
Points per game9.69.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Mark Jackson ranks higher in career impact.

Mark JacksonMetricRajon Rondo
#229LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#303
+3.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4Leads
+2.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6
+2,557 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,749 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Mark JacksonMetricRajon Rondo
821Listed-team regular-season wins829Leads
53.8%Listed-team winning percentage54.9%Leads
650-win team seasons6
060-win team seasons2Leads
15LeadsPlayoff team seasons13

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Mark JacksonMetricRajon Rondo
14LeadsPlayoff appearances10
131Playoff games134Leads
66Team playoff wins88Leads
1Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Mark JacksonMetricRajon Rondo
1All-Star4Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA1Leads
0All-Defense4Leads
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Mark JacksonRajon RondoPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.