hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Norman Powell vs. Patrick Beverley: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Patrick Beverley ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1025Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#897Leads
+1.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+0.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
76.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.0Leads
+640 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+772 ptsLeads
146.6Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better132.1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Patrick Beverley #897 and Norman Powell #1025. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/norman-powell/patrick-beverley/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedNorman Powell97.020 · No. 1,025Patrick Beverley86.080 · No. 897

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Norman Powell

97.020 composite · No. 1,025 all-time

Norman Powell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 562019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802025–26No. 922021–2276.00050%38.000
Best 5No. 562019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802025–26No. 922021–22No. 1332015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1342020–2199.00030%29.700
Best 10No. 562019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802025–26No. 922021–22No. 1332015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1342020–21No. 1532022–23No. 1542024–25No. 1872018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2242016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2532023–24146.60020%29.320

38.000 + 29.700 + 29.320= 97.020

Patrick Beverley

86.080 composite · No. 897 all-time

Patrick Beverley's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 382012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 632021–22No. 1002016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.00050%33.500
Best 5No. 382012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 632021–22No. 1002016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1252015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate87.20030%26.160
Best 10No. 382012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 632021–22No. 1002016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1252015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1512018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1582013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1732014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1812020–21No. 2222023–24132.10020%26.420

33.500 + 26.160 + 26.420= 86.080

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1025#897Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better76.067.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better99.087.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.6132.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#669#577Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9+2.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4+1.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1+0.4Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+640 pts+772 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Games675666
Minutes16,65517,689

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
True shooting percentage60.1%Better result for this metric.54.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile60.0%Better result for this metric.54.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Field-goal percentage47.1%Better result for this metric.41.3%
Three-point percentage39.6%Better result for this metric.37.1%
Free-throw percentage82.4%Better result for this metric.76.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.1%18.3%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.63.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.2%Better result for this metric.13.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%8.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.74.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%1.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Norman Powell and Patrick Beverley
MetricNorman PowellPatrick Beverley
Points per game14.0Better result for this metric.8.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Patrick Beverley ranks higher in career impact so far.

Norman PowellMetricPatrick Beverley
#1025Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#897Leads
+1.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+0.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+640 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+772 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Norman PowellMetricPatrick Beverley
603Listed-team regular-season wins662Leads
58.2%Listed-team winning percentage58.7%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons3
060-win team seasons0
9Playoff team seasons12Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Norman Powell leads every available measure below.

Norman PowellMetricPatrick Beverley
9Playoff appearances9
91LeadsPlayoff games71
49LeadsTeam playoff wins34
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Norman PowellMetricPatrick Beverley
1LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense3Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Norman PowellPatrick BeverleyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.