hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Scott Williams vs. Shellie McMillon: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Shellie McMillon ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1710Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#479Leads
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1
-2.4Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5Leads
#134Best league finish#44Leads
-90 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+67 ptsLeads
746LeadsGames263

Career Impact Rank places Shellie McMillon #479 and Scott Williams #1710. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Scott Williams had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/scott-williams/shellie-mcmillon/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedScott Williams176.753 · No. 1,710Shellie McMillon54.977 · No. 479

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Scott Williams

176.753 composite · No. 1,710 all-time

Scott Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate157.66750%78.833
Best 5No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate179.20030%53.760
Best 10No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2271996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2491999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2612003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2751997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3002001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate220.80020%44.160

78.833 + 53.760 + 44.160= 176.753

Shellie McMillon

54.977 composite · No. 479 all-time

Shellie McMillon's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 441959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.33350%23.667
Best 5No. 441959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 81.557.90030%17.370
Best 10No. 441959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 81.569.70020%13.940

23.667 + 17.370 + 13.940= 54.977

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1710#479Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better157.747.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.257.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better220.869.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4464#1549Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Better result for this metric.-1.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9Better result for this metric.-1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.1Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-90 pts+67 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Games746263
Minutes12,2204,977

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
True shooting percentage50.4%Better result for this metric.46.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.7%Better result for this metric.46.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Field-goal percentage46.7%Better result for this metric.43.4%
Three-point percentage11.1%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage72.1%Better result for this metric.63.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.6%Unavailable
Assists per game0.60.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.4%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.8%Unavailable
Rebounds per game4.76.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Scott Williams and Shellie McMillon
MetricScott WilliamsShellie McMillon
Points per game5.19.1Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Shellie McMillon ranks higher in career impact.

Scott WilliamsMetricShellie McMillon
#1710Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#479Leads
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1
-1.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-90 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+67 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Scott Williams leads every available measure below.

Scott WilliamsMetricShellie McMillon
679LeadsListed-team regular-season wins158
51.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage40.9%
6Leads50-win team seasons0
2Leads60-win team seasons0
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Scott Williams leads every available measure below.

Scott WilliamsMetricShellie McMillon
8LeadsPlayoff appearances3
94LeadsPlayoff games9
66LeadsTeam playoff wins3
3LeadsFinals appearances0
3LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Scott WilliamsMetricShellie McMillon
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Scott WilliamsShellie McMillonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.