hussEyquation
Explore rankings

Player profile · PHI

Adem Bona

Adem Bona advanced stats and career rankings

RoleC · Age 22
Availability71 games · 18 starts
Workload17.4 MPG · 1,234 minutes
Relative impactPHI #9 of 12 · C #64 of 72
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
EvidenceEstablished

Low ranking precision · Likely rank #103–#368

Bottom line · 2025–26

In 2025–26, Adem Bona ranked 305th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 327th, led by strong shot blocking despite costly turnovers. With only about 1,200 minutes, he finished in the 21st percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Adem Bona's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
23
14.7
Season Value
21
-6.1

Scoring role

Usage
4
11.1%
True shooting
89
63.8%
3-point attempt rate
6
2.7%
Free-throw rate
97
51.4%

Creation and control

Assist rate
1
3.4%
Turnover avoidance
8
17.2%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
81
13.6%
Steal rate
22
1.2%
Block rate
97
6.2%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
69
+0.92
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
43
−0.20

Workload

Minutes per game
24
17.4
Games played
75
71
Total minutes
43
1,234

Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Every season

Adem Bona advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

SeasonTeamAgeGPMPEra-centered box impactImpact RateRate rankSeason ValueValue percentileEvidence
2025–26live modelPHI22711,234-2.4914.7#305-6.121stEstablished
2024–25PHI2158905-1.1633.8#25815.532ndEstablished

Career movement

Adem Bona's career impact by season

Peak -1.16 in 2024–25 · 2 seasons · 2,139 minutes

The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.

Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload

Early-career comparison

Compare the first 2 seasons

Only the first 2 NBA seasons are compared, so this is a similarity of starts—not a prediction of the full career.

Adem BonaManny Leaks

NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15

Similar starts

Players with starts similar to Adem Bona

The score compares the first 2 seasons by impact, workload, position, and trajectory. It does not claim the careers will finish alike.

Why this rank?

Why Adem Bona ranks #305

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

01 · Box-score prior-0.27

Prior rank #327

02 · Multi-season RAPM-0.13

Current total +0.01 ±0.9
Split model · O +0.92 · D -0.20 = +0.72

03 · Bounded correction+0.06

Maximum ±0.75

04 · Model estimate-0.21

Before the within-season scale

05 · MPG-adjusted rate14.7

14.7 unadjusted · 86% role factor · rank #305

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

What the point estimate meansLow precision

The model's 80% impact interval is -2.49 to +2.00. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
0%
Top 50 chance
2%
Top 100 chance
9%
80% rank range
#103#368
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →