Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · WAS
Anthony Gill
Anthony Gill stats, teams and career impact
#2632 all-timeCareer averages · 3.8 PPG · 1.9 RPG · 0.7 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- 2025–26 team
- Washington Wizards
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 7 in (201 cm) · 230 lb (104 kg)
- Born
- October 17, 1992 (34 yrs old)
- College
- South Carolina, Virginia
- NBA seasons
- 6 seasons · 2020–21 to 2025–26
Selected season2025–26 · WAS · 55 games · 951 minutes
- PPG
- 5.8
- RPG
- 2.9
- APG
- 1.3
- #285 of 395 55 games · 951 minutes
- 27th percentile
Career overview
Why Anthony Gill currently ranks #2632 all time
Anthony Gill ranks #2632 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #269.7. His full-career value already ranks #1850 after 6 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.
450+ minutes required per season
285 games · Career Value Rank #1850
Head to head
Compare Anthony Gill with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.
- Anthony Gill vs. Anthony Randolph Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Leon Powe Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Jeremiah Robinson-Earl Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Nassir Little Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Jamie Feick Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Jeff Judkins Similar career path
- Anthony Gill vs. Josh Green Same-era comparison
- Anthony Gill vs. Patrick Williams Same-era comparison
- Anthony Gill vs. Isaac Okoro Same-era comparison
- Anthony Gill vs. Zeke Nnaji Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Washington Wizards
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 54.5%FG%
- Three-point
- 31.2%3P%
- Free throw
- 74.9%FT%
285 career games · 3,119 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Anthony Gill stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 1.3 | -0.11 | WAS | 55 | 8 | 17.3 | 62.8% | 35.4% | 73.9% | #285 | -3.1 |
| 2024–25 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | -3.14 | WAS | 51 | 0 | 7.8 | 48.9% | 32.3% | 66.0% | — | -9.5 |
| 2023–24 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.7 | -2.67 | WAS | 50 | 3 | 9.3 | 46.9% | 24.4% | 80.6% | #309 | -6.7 |
| 2022–23 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | -2.70 | WAS | 59 | 8 | 10.6 | 53.8% | 13.8% | 73.1% | #319 | -9.0 |
| 2021–22 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 0.6 | -0.68 | WAS | 44 | 0 | 10.5 | 56.9% | 53.8% | 80.8% | #215 | 12.4 |
| 2020–21 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 0.4 | -3.76 | WAS | 26 | 4 | 8.4 | 50.0% | 29.2% | 81.3% | — | -8.3 |
| Career | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.7 | — | WAS | 285 | — | 10.9 | 54.5% | 31.2% | 74.9% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
55 games · 951 minutes · 19.4 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank
-3.1 total value · 395 qualified players
Career Composite 294.0 · lower is better · 6 seasons
Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #98–#365
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
- Impact estimate
- The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Anthony Gill ranked 285th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 177th, led by elite scoring efficiency despite costly turnovers. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court defense was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. With only nearly 1,000 minutes, he finished in the 27th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Anthony Gill's impact
Overall value
Scoring role
Creation and control
Possession stats
Lineup signal
Workload
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Ranking editions
How the ranking changed
Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.
19.4 Impact Rate · 951 MP
Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026
First snapshot19.4 Impact Rate · 951 MP
Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026
↑2 since priorEvery season
Anthony Gill advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | WAS | 33 | 55 | 951 | -0.11 | 19.4 | #285 | -3.1 | 27th | Standard |
| 2024–25 | WAS | 32 | 51 | 397 | -3.14 | — | — | -9.5 | — | Limited |
| 2023–24 | WAS | 31 | 50 | 466 | -2.67 | 16.8 | #309 | -6.7 | 22nd | Standard |
| 2022–23 | WAS | 30 | 59 | 624 | -2.70 | 15.9 | #319 | -9.0 | 19th | Standard |
| 2021–22 | WAS | 29 | 44 | 463 | -0.68 | 44.3 | #215 | 12.4 | 34th | Standard |
| 2020–21 | WAS | 28 | 26 | 218 | -3.76 | — | — | -8.3 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Anthony Gill's box impact by season
Peak box impact -0.11 points per 100 possessions in 2025–26 · 6 seasons · 3,119 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Anthony Gill | Anthony Randolph |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.8 | -1.6 |
| 2 | -0.7 | -0.8 |
| 3 | -2.7 | -1.6 |
| 4 | -2.7 | -0.8 |
| 5 | -3.1 | -2.9 |
| 6 | -0.1 | -1.1 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Anthony Gill
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Anthony Randolph
93career similarity score
77/100 closest-season score · 2025–26 ↔ 2013–14PF · All-Time Career #2367Leon Powe
91career similarity score
79/100 closest-season score · 2025–26 ↔ 2008–09PF · All-Time Career #2425Jeremiah Robinson-Earl
91career similarity score
78/100 closest-season score · 2025–26 ↔ 2024–25Why this rank?
Why Anthony Gill ranks #285
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.
Prior rank #177
Current total -3.27 ±0.9
Split model · O -1.19 · D -1.89 = -3.08
Maximum ±1.25
Points per 100 possessions · higher is better
Higher is better · 19.4 before the MPG adjustment · rank #285
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
The model's 80% impact interval is -2.41 to +2.11. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 2%
- Top 100 chance
- 11%
- 80% rank range
- #98–#365
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →