hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · DET

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Cade Cunningham

Cade Cunningham

Cade Cunningham stats, teams and career impact

#1262 all-timeCareer averages · 22.5 PPG · 5.4 RPG · 8.0 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Point guard
2025–26 team
Detroit Pistons
Height / weight
6 ft 6 in (198 cm) · 220 lb (100 kg)
Born
September 25, 2001 (25 yrs old)
College
Oklahoma State
NBA seasons
5 seasons · 2021–22 to 2025–26

Selected season2025–26 · DET · 64 games · 2,172 minutes

PPG
23.9
RPG
5.5
APG
9.9
Impact Rate Rank
#11 of 395
64 games · 2,172 minutes
Season Value percentile
97th percentile

Career overview

Why Cade Cunningham currently ranks #1262 all time

Cade Cunningham ranks #1262 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #51.0. His full-career value already ranks #587 after 5 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.

Peak#11 in 2025–26

Best league finish

Sustained excellence4 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth5 seasons so far

272 games · Career Value Rank #587

NBA honors2× All-Star · 2× All-NBAContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Cade Cunningham with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.

  1. Cade Cunningham vs. Josh Giddey Similar career path
  2. Cade Cunningham vs. Tyrese Maxey Similar career path
  3. Cade Cunningham vs. Anthony Edwards Similar career path
  4. Cade Cunningham vs. Desmond Bane Similar career path
  5. Cade Cunningham vs. Immanuel Quickley Similar career path
  6. Cade Cunningham vs. Trey Murphy III Similar career path
  7. Cade Cunningham vs. Sandro Mamukelashvili Same-era comparison
  8. Cade Cunningham vs. Jalen Johnson Same-era comparison
  9. Cade Cunningham vs. Austin Reaves Same-era comparison
  10. Cade Cunningham vs. Franz Wagner Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Detroit Pistons

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
44.9%FG%
Three-point
34.0%3P%
Free throw
84.0%FT%

272 career games · 9,186 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Cade Cunningham stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2025–2623.95.59.9+4.71DET646433.946.1%34.2%81.2%#11116.7
2024–2526.16.19.1+3.07DET707035.046.9%35.6%84.6%#39258.7
2023–2422.74.37.5+0.79DET626233.544.9%35.5%86.9%#103120.4
2022–2319.96.26.0-1.64DET121233.341.5%27.9%83.7%—2.9
2021–2217.45.55.6-0.37DET646432.641.6%31.4%84.5%#19269.7
Career22.55.48.0—DET272—33.844.9%34.0%84.0%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

Film evidence

Cade Cunningham highlights

Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.

Season highlights

Cade Cunningham's spectacular season

Cade Cunningham's season highlights adds visual context to the numbers on this page, especially his pace, size and playmaking as Detroit's primary creator. The vetted footage complements the season tables and impact model.

RolePG · Age 24
Availability64 games · 64 starts
Workload33.9 MPG · 2,172 minutes
Relative impactDET #1 of 12 · PG #5 of 70
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Impact Rate Rank#11 of 395

64 games · 2,172 minutes · 96.4 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank

Data coverageBroad

Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #6–#201

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Impact estimate
The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.

Bottom line · 2025–26

Cade Cunningham delivered an elite 2025–26 campaign, ranking 11th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 13th, led by rebounding and shot blocking. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Over about 2,200 minutes, he finished in the 97th percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Cade Cunningham's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
96.4 / 100
Season Value
97
116.7

Scoring role

Usage
96
30.5%
True shooting
38
56.4%
3-point attempt rate
24
30.8%
Free-throw rate
73
32.1%

Creation and control

Assist rate
99
45.2%
Turnover avoidance
20
14.8%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
52
9.2%
Steal rate
75
2.0%
Block rate
76
2.5%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
97
+3.52 pts/100
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
77
+1.01 pts/100

Workload

Minutes per game
95
33.9
Games played
53
64
Total minutes
86
2,172

A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Ranking editions

How the ranking changed

Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.

Full season · original model (v1.0)#11

96.4 Impact Rate · 2,172 MP

Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026

First snapshot
Full season · hussEyquation v1.1#11

96.4 Impact Rate · 2,172 MP

Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026

No rank change

Every season

Cade Cunningham advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2025–26live modelDET24642,172+4.7196.4#11116.797thBroad
2024–25DET23702,452+3.0790.2#39258.796thBroad
2023–24DET22622,074+0.7972.4#103120.480thBroad
2022–23DET2112400-1.64——2.9—Limited
2021–22DET20642,088-0.3750.3#19269.763rdBroad

Career movement

Cade Cunningham's box impact by season

Peak box impact +4.71 points per 100 possessions in 2025–26 · 5 seasons · 9,186 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Cade CunninghamJosh Giddey
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Cade Cunningham and Josh Giddey era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonCade CunninghamJosh Giddey
1-0.40.0
2-1.61.7
30.80.8
43.13.5
54.73.6

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Cade Cunningham

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

Why this rank?

Why Cade Cunningham ranks #11

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.

01 · Box-score prior+2.37

Prior rank #13

02 · Multi-season RAPM+3.26

Current total +5.20 ±0.9
Split model · O +3.52 · D +1.01 = +4.53

03 · Bounded correction+0.26

Maximum ±1.25

04 · Impact estimate+2.63

Points per 100 possessions · higher is better

05 · Impact Rate · 0–10096.4

Higher is better · 96.4 before the MPG adjustment · rank #11

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

Ranking certaintyWide

The model's 80% impact interval is +0.37 to +4.87. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
36%
Top 50 chance
53%
Top 100 chance
71%
80% rank range
#6–#201
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →