77.6 score · 95% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · MEM

Cedric Coward
Cedric Coward advanced stats and career rankings
48.0 total value · 395 qualified players
32.6 all-time composite · 1 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #25–#289
Bottom line · 2025–26
Cedric Coward delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 61st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 139th, led by rebounding and shot blocking. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Over about 1,600 minutes, he finished in the 82nd percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Cedric Coward's impact
Overall value
Scoring role
Creation and control
Possession stats
Lineup signal
Workload
Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Cedric Coward advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | MEM | 22 | 62 | 1,598 | +0.49 | 77.6 | #61 | 48.0 | 82nd | Established |
Career movement
Cedric Coward's career impact by season
Peak +0.49 in 2025–26 · 1 seasons · 1,598 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Early-career comparison
Compare the first 1 seasons
Only the first 1 NBA seasons are compared, so this is a similarity of starts—not a prediction of the full career.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar starts
Players with starts similar to Cedric Coward
The score compares the first 1 seasons by impact, workload, position, and trajectory. It does not claim the careers will finish alike.
Dave Minor
88%start match
82% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1951–52SG · All-Time Career #968Paul Graham
87%start match
93% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1991–92PG · All-Time Career #276Danny Finn
87%start match
90% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1953–54SF · All-Time Career #728Paul Thompson
86%start match
92% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1983–84PF · All-Time Career #309Stan Miasek
86%start match
80% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1951–52PG · All-Time Career #1458Mike Iuzzolino
85%start match
90% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1991–92Why this rank?
Why Cedric Coward ranks #61
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #139
Current total +3.10 ±0.9
Split model · O +2.43 · D +0.19 = +2.61
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
80.2 unadjusted · 95% role factor · rank #61
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
The model's 80% impact interval is -0.76 to +3.68. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 10%
- Top 50 chance
- 23%
- Top 100 chance
- 43%
- 80% rank range
- #25–#289
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →