Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · MIN / POR
Jake Layman
Jake Layman stats, teams and career impact
#2485 all-timeCareer averages · 4.8 PPG · 1.7 RPG · 0.5 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Small forward
- Final NBA team
- Minnesota Timberwolves
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 8 in (203 cm) · 209 lb (95 kg)
- Born
- March 7, 1994 (32 yrs old)
- College
- Maryland
- NBA seasons
- 6 seasons · 2016–17 to 2021–22
Career summaryJake Layman was a small forward who played 6 NBA seasons, from 2016–17 through 2021–22.
- Career PPG
- 4.8
- Career RPG
- 1.7
- Career APG
- 0.5
- #205 in 2020–21
- #2485 all-time
Career overview
Why Jake Layman ranks #2485 all time
Jake Layman ranks #2485 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #240.0. His full-career value ranks #3905, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.
450+ minutes required per season
243 games · Career Value Rank #3905
Head to head
Compare Jake Layman with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Jake Layman vs. Cartier Martin Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. Marty Byrnes Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. Nassir Little Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. Thomas Robinson Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. Zeke Nnaji Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. Kevin McKenna Similar career path
- Jake Layman vs. DeAndre' Bembry Same-era comparison
- Jake Layman vs. Marquese Chriss Same-era comparison
- Jake Layman vs. Timothé Luwawu-Cabarrot Same-era comparison
- Jake Layman vs. Emmanuel Mudiay Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Portland Trail Blazers and Minnesota Timberwolves
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 46.0%FG%
- Three-point
- 30.0%3P%
- Free throw
- 71.9%FT%
243 career games · 3,099 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Jake Layman stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | -5.86 | MIN | 34 | 1 | 6.8 | 41.1% | 22.9% | 72.2% | — | -18.7 |
| 2020–21 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | -0.67 | MIN | 45 | 11 | 13.9 | 49.5% | 29.5% | 70.3% | #205 | 17.7 |
| 2019–20 | 9.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | -3.00 | MIN | 23 | 2 | 22.0 | 45.3% | 33.3% | 75.0% | #305 | -10.9 |
| 2018–19 | 7.6 | 3.1 | 0.7 | -1.10 | POR | 71 | 33 | 18.7 | 50.9% | 32.6% | 70.4% | #210 | 24.6 |
| 2017–18 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | -7.62 | POR | 35 | 1 | 4.6 | 29.8% | 20.0% | 66.7% | — | -18.1 |
| 2016–17 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | -8.14 | POR | 35 | 1 | 7.1 | 29.2% | 25.5% | 76.5% | — | -30.8 |
| Career | 4.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | — | MIN/POR | 243 | — | 12.8 | 46.0% | 30.0% | 71.9% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
273.8 composite · lower is better
292.0 average league finish
-36 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Jake Layman ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 370.0
- Qualified seasons
- 3
- All-time rank
- #2485
Every season
Jake Layman advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | MIN | 27 | 34 | 231 | -5.86 | — | — | -18.7 | — | Limited |
| 2020–21 | MIN | 26 | 45 | 627 | -0.67 | 44.6 | #205 | 17.7 | 35th | Standard |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 25 | 23 | 505 | -3.00 | 13.6 | #305 | -10.9 | 17th | Standard |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 24 | 71 | 1,327 | -1.10 | 43.2 | #210 | 24.6 | 44th | Broad |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 23 | 35 | 160 | -7.62 | — | — | -18.1 | — | Limited |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 22 | 35 | 249 | -8.14 | — | — | -30.8 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Jake Layman's box impact by season
Peak box impact -0.67 points per 100 possessions in 2020–21 · 6 seasons · 3,099 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Jake Layman | Cartier Martin |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -8.1 | -4.1 |
| 2 | -7.6 | -4.6 |
| 3 | -1.1 | -0.4 |
| 4 | -3.0 | -0.7 |
| 5 | -0.7 | -1.3 |
| 6 | -5.9 | -1.1 |
| 7 | Did not play | -8.5 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jake Layman
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Cartier Martin
89career similarity score
98/100 closest-season score · 2020–21 ↔ 2010–11SF · All-Time Career #1857Marty Byrnes
89career similarity score
88/100 closest-season score · 2020–21 ↔ 1980–81SF · All-Time Career #2557Nassir Little
89career similarity score
86/100 closest-season score · 2020–21 ↔ 2022–23Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →