21.2 score · 86% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · DEN / LAL / MIN / UTA
Jarred Vanderbilt
Jarred Vanderbilt advanced stats and career rankings
RolePF · Age 26
Availability65 games · 3 starts
Workload17.4 MPG · 1,128 minutes
Relative impactLAL #7 of 11 · PF #57 of 76
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
-1.9 total value · 395 qualified players
137.9 all-time composite · 8 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #94–#364
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Jarred Vanderbilt ranked 279th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 293rd, led by elite steal creation despite costly turnovers. Over about 1,100 minutes, he finished in the 30th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Jarred Vanderbilt's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
29
21.2Season Value
30
-1.9Scoring role
Usage
9
12.4%True shooting
26
54.4%3-point attempt rate
45
41.3%Free-throw rate
46
23.3%Creation and control
Assist rate
30
9.6%Turnover avoidance
7
17.5%Possession stats
Rebound rate
87
15.2%Steal rate
90
2.4%Block rate
58
1.6%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
47
+0.05Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
25
−0.89Workload
Minutes per game
23
17.4Games played
56
65Total minutes
35
1,128Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Jarred Vanderbilt advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | LAL | 26 | 65 | 1,128 | -1.87 | 21.2 | #279 | -1.9 | 30th | Established |
| 2024–25 | LAL | 25 | 36 | 581 | -1.30 | 31.2 | #268 | 8.2 | 27th | Established |
| 2023–24 | LAL | 24 | 29 | 581 | -1.24 | 35.7 | #239 | 9.3 | 31st | Established |
| 2022–23 | LAL/UTA | 23 | 78 | 1,879 | +0.72 | 70.1 | #114 | 107.4 | 76th | Strong |
| 2021–22 | MIN | 22 | 74 | 1,880 | +0.23 | 61.5 | #149 | 88.0 | 68th | Strong |
| 2020–21 | MIN | 21 | 64 | 1,139 | +1.32 | 75.8 | #90 | 80.1 | 72nd | Strong |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | DEN/MIN | 20 | 11 | 46 | -10.01 | — | — | -7.5 | — | Limited |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 19 | 17 | 69 | -9.24 | — | — | -10.2 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Jarred Vanderbilt's career impact by season
Peak +1.32 in 2020–21 · 8 seasons · 7,303 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Jarred VanderbiltDrew Eubanks
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jarred Vanderbilt
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #2397
Drew Eubanks
89%career match
89% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2021–22PF · All-Time Career #2038Andray Blatche
88%career match
86% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2008–09PF · All-Time Career #2342Kenrich Williams
88%career match
86% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2020–21PF · All-Time Career #769Curtis Perry
88%career match
82% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 1972–73PF · All-Time Career #2575Marvin Bagley III
86%career match
88% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2023–24C · All-Time Career #897Jim Davis
86%career match
82% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 1968–69Why this rank?
Why Jarred Vanderbilt ranks #279
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #293
Current total -0.56 ±1.0
Split model · O +0.05 · D -0.89 = -0.84
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
21.2 unadjusted · 86% role factor · rank #279
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -2.33 to +2.18. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 3%
- Top 100 chance
- 12%
- 80% rank range
- #94–#364
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →