60.3 score · 89% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · MEM / UTA
John Konchar
John Konchar advanced stats and career rankings
RoleSG · Age 29
Availability56 games · 8 starts
Workload19.9 MPG · 1,115 minutes
Relative impactMEM/UTA #1 of 3 · SG #25 of 109
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
24.7 total value · 395 qualified players
73.9 all-time composite · 7 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #46–#315
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, John Konchar ranked 115th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 35th, led by rebounding and shot blocking despite costly turnovers. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. With only about 1,100 minutes, he finished in the 69th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives John Konchar's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
71
60.3Season Value
69
24.7Scoring role
Usage
1
9.4%True shooting
42
56.8%3-point attempt rate
64
49.7%Free-throw rate
41
22.1%Creation and control
Assist rate
52
13.4%Turnover avoidance
30
13.8%Possession stats
Rebound rate
71
11.6%Steal rate
99
3.5%Block rate
84
3.2%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
1
−2.94Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
90
+1.95Workload
Minutes per game
34
19.9Games played
36
56Total minutes
34
1,115Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
John Konchar advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | MEM/UTA | 29 | 56 | 1,115 | +3.01 | 60.3 | #115 | 24.7 | 69th | Established |
| 2024–25 | MEM | 28 | 46 | 558 | +1.34 | 75.5 | #96 | 40.2 | 50th | Established |
| 2023–24 | MEM | 27 | 55 | 1,173 | +1.26 | 77.6 | #84 | 78.3 | 67th | Strong |
| 2022–23 | MEM | 26 | 72 | 1,494 | +0.34 | 64.6 | #135 | 73.6 | 64th | Strong |
| 2021–22 | MEM | 25 | 72 | 1,292 | +1.93 | 82.8 | #67 | 106.0 | 76th | Strong |
| 2020–21 | MEM | 24 | 43 | 575 | +2.18 | 83.4 | #62 | 50.3 | 57th | Established |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 23 | 19 | 181 | -0.95 | — | — | 4.1 | — | Limited |
Career movement
John Konchar's career impact by season
Peak +3.01 in 2025–26 · 7 seasons · 6,388 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
John KoncharScott Burrell
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to John Konchar
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
SF · All-Time Career #1047
Scott Burrell
90%career match
92% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1997–98SG · All-Time Career #1384Matisse Thybulle
90%career match
89% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2025–26SG · All-Time Career #912Ronnie Brewer
90%career match
84% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2010–11PG · All-Time Career #1151Immanuel Quickley
89%career match
88% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2024–25SF · All-Time Career #405Sonny Parker
89%career match
83% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1980–81PG · All-Time Career #1315Tre Jones
89%career match
86% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2024–25Why this rank?
Why John Konchar ranks #115
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #35
Current total -1.29 ±1.0
Split model · O -2.94 · D +1.95 = -0.98
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
64.7 unadjusted · 89% role factor · rank #115
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.19 to +3.33. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 2%
- Top 50 chance
- 12%
- Top 100 chance
- 30%
- 80% rank range
- #46–#315
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →