hussEyquation
Explore rankings

Player profile · DEN

Spencer Jones

Spencer Jones advanced stats and career rankings

RoleSF · Age 24
Availability64 games · 37 starts
Workload22.1 MPG · 1,417 minutes
Relative impactDEN #10 of 13 · SF #62 of 68
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
EvidenceEstablished

Low ranking precision · Likely rank #115–#377

Bottom line · 2025–26

In 2025–26, Spencer Jones ranked 348th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 331st, led by strong scoring efficiency. Over about 1,400 minutes, he finished in the 8th percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Spencer Jones's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
12
7.2
Season Value
8
-18.7

Scoring role

Usage
1
9.7%
True shooting
81
61.9%
3-point attempt rate
75
55.0%
Free-throw rate
32
19.5%

Creation and control

Assist rate
1
4.5%
Turnover avoidance
79
9.8%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
44
8.3%
Steal rate
64
1.8%
Block rate
65
1.9%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
20
−1.00
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
69
+0.74

Workload

Minutes per game
45
22.1
Games played
53
64
Total minutes
53
1,417

Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Every season

Spencer Jones advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

SeasonTeamAgeGPMPEra-centered box impactImpact RateRate rankSeason ValueValue percentileEvidence
2025–26live modelDEN24641,417-2.537.2#348-18.78thEstablished
2024–25DEN2320125-10.48-22.0Limited

Career movement

Spencer Jones's career impact by season

Peak -2.53 in 2025–26 · 2 seasons · 1,542 minutes

The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.

Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload

Early-career comparison

Compare the first 2 seasons

Only the first 2 NBA seasons are compared, so this is a similarity of starts—not a prediction of the full career.

Spencer JonesCharles Pittman

NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15

Similar starts

Players with starts similar to Spencer Jones

The score compares the first 2 seasons by impact, workload, position, and trajectory. It does not claim the careers will finish alike.

Why this rank?

Why Spencer Jones ranks #348

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

01 · Box-score prior-0.28

Prior rank #331

02 · Multi-season RAPM-1.60

Current total -1.61 ±1.0
Split model · O -1.00 · D +0.74 = -0.26

03 · Bounded correction-0.33

Maximum ±0.75

04 · Model estimate-0.61

Before the within-season scale

05 · MPG-adjusted rate7.2

7.2 unadjusted · 91% role factor · rank #348

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

What the point estimate meansLow precision

The model's 80% impact interval is -2.87 to +1.64. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
0%
Top 50 chance
2%
Top 100 chance
8%
80% rank range
#115#377
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →