12.7 score · 85% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · BRK / PHI / POR
Trendon Watford
Trendon Watford advanced stats and career rankings
RolePF · Age 25
Availability53 games · 7 starts
Workload16.3 MPG · 864 minutes
Relative impactPHI #12 of 12 · PF #66 of 76
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
-6.9 total value · 395 qualified players
177.8 all-time composite · 5 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #112–#370
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Trendon Watford ranked 320th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 265th, led by elite passing despite costly turnovers. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. Over about 900 minutes, he finished in the 19th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Trendon Watford's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
19
12.7Season Value
19
-6.9Scoring role
Usage
44
17.9%True shooting
47
57.3%3-point attempt rate
14
18.7%Free-throw rate
65
28.7%Creation and control
Assist rate
80
21.8%Turnover avoidance
7
17.5%Possession stats
Rebound rate
68
11.0%Steal rate
5
0.9%Block rate
75
2.4%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
5
−2.05Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
20
−1.14Workload
Minutes per game
19
16.3Games played
29
53Total minutes
21
864Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Trendon Watford advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | PHI | 25 | 53 | 864 | -1.40 | 12.7 | #320 | -6.9 | 19th | Established |
| 2024–25 | BRK | 24 | 44 | 913 | -1.67 | 25.3 | #291 | 6.0 | 25th | Established |
| 2023–24 | BRK | 23 | 63 | 856 | -0.17 | 53.8 | #172 | 31.7 | 45th | Established |
| 2022–23 | POR | 22 | 62 | 1,182 | -0.94 | 43.9 | #213 | 25.6 | 44th | Strong |
| 2021–22 | POR | 21 | 48 | 869 | +0.25 | 61.7 | #148 | 40.0 | 49th | Established |
Career movement
Trendon Watford's career impact by season
Peak +0.25 in 2021–22 · 5 seasons · 4,684 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Trendon WatfordLarry Staverman
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Trendon Watford
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #492
Larry Staverman
94%career match
92% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 1958–59PF · All-Time Career #935Al Tucker
93%career match
86% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 1969–70PF · All-Time Career #1904Derrek Dickey
93%career match
91% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 1973–74SF · All-Time Career #2185Rodney Carney
93%career match
90% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 2007–08PF · All-Time Career #2596Craig Smith
93%career match
85% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 2006–07PF · All-Time Career #2511Josh Boone
93%career match
87% season match · 2021–22 ↔ 2009–10Why this rank?
Why Trendon Watford ranks #320
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #265
Current total -3.44 ±1.0
Split model · O -2.05 · D -1.14 = -3.19
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
12.7 unadjusted · 85% role factor · rank #320
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -2.56 to +1.86. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 1%
- Top 100 chance
- 8%
- 80% rank range
- #112–#370
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →