Menu
Last updated Oct 6, 2026
NBA impact data · 1950–51 to present
1952–53 NBA Player Rankings
Impact Rate and Season Value rankings for the 1952–53 regular season—the NBA season ending in 1953.
Season ending 1953
Who ranks No. 1 in 1952–53?
Ed Macauley ranks No. 1 in hussEyquation Impact Rate for the 1952–53 regular season. This is a model-based impact ranking, not the NBA scoring-leader or standings table. The top ten below compare per-possession impact within this season across 95 qualified players.
The 1952–53 NBA season ended in 1953. If you mean the season that began in 1953, see 1953–54.
- #1Ed MacauleyBOS100.0
- #2Bob CousyBOS98.9
- #3Dolph SchayesSYR97.9
- #4George MikanMNL96.8
- #5Mel HutchinsMLH95.7
- #6Neil JohnstonPHW94.7
- #7Ernie VandewegheNYK93.6
- #8Jack ColemanROC92.6
- #9Harry GallatinNYK91.5
- #10Bill SharmanBOS90.4
1952–53 Impact Rate rankings
A backtested impact estimate from the statistics recorded in that era, with uncertainty ranges.
Swipe for more player stats →
| Compare | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100.0 | BOS | C | 24 | 69 | — | 42.1 | 2,902 | ||
| 2 | 98.9 | BOS | PG | 24 | 71 | — | 41.5 | 2,945 | ||
| 3 | 97.9 | SYR | PF | 24 | 71 | — | 37.6 | 2,668 | ||
| 4 | 96.8 | MNL | C | 28 | 70 | — | 37.9 | 2,651 | ||
| 5 | 95.7 | MLH | C | 24 | 71 | — | 40.7 | 2,891 | ||
| 6 | 94.7 | PHW | C | 23 | 70 | — | 45.2 | 3,166 | ||
| 7 | 93.6 | NYK | SG | 24 | 61 | — | 28.6 | 1,745 | ||
| 8 | 92.6 | ROC | PF | 28 | 70 | — | 37.5 | 2,625 | ||
| 9 | 91.5 | NYK | PF | 25 | 70 | — | 33.3 | 2,333 | ||
| 10 | 90.4 | BOS | SG | 26 | 71 | — | 32.9 | 2,333 | ||
| 11 | 89.4 | FTW / PHW | SG | 30 | 70 | — | 38.4 | 2,690 | ||
| 12 | 88.3 | MNL | PF | 24 | 70 | — | 35.2 | 2,465 | ||
| 13 | 87.2 | INO | SF | 28 | 71 | — | 40.4 | 2,871 | ||
| 14 | 86.2 | MLH | PF | 26 | 69 | — | 38.1 | 2,626 | ||
| 15 | 85.1 | ROC | SG | 31 | 70 | — | 36.8 | 2,577 | ||
| 16 | 84.0 | NYK | PG | 27 | 61 | — | 29.2 | 1,783 | ||
| 17 | 83.0 | MNL | SF | 30 | 66 | — | 36.4 | 2,403 | ||
| 18 | 81.9 | INO | SF | 26 | 66 | — | 21.6 | 1,424 | ||
| 19 | 80.9 | BLB / MLH | PF | 30 | 71 | — | 31.5 | 2,235 | ||
| 20 | 79.8 | SYR | PG | 24 | 71 | — | 35.5 | 2,519 | ||
| 21 | 78.7 | SYR | SG | 25 | 67 | — | 40.1 | 2,684 | ||
| 22 | 77.7 | FTW | C | 24 | 67 | — | 34.4 | 2,303 | ||
| 23 | 76.6 | NYK | SG | 25 | 70 | — | 33.1 | 2,316 | ||
| 24 | 75.5 | INO | PF | 26 | 70 | — | 33.2 | 2,327 | ||
| 25 | 74.5 | NYK | PF | 30 | 70 | — | 35.7 | 2,496 | ||
| 26 | 73.4 | PHW | SG | 24 | 31 | — | 32.7 | 1,015 | ||
| 27 | 72.3 | BLB / FTW | — | 28 | 69 | — | 20.6 | 1,424 | ||
| 28 | 71.3 | BLB / MLH | PG | 30 | 59 | — | 27.3 | 1,610 | ||
| 29 | 70 | FTW | PG | 22 | 26 | — | 25.5 | 663 | ||
| 30 | 69 | PHW | SG | 30 | 33 | — | 26.7 | 882 | ||
| 31 | 68.1 | BOS | SG | 26 | 71 | — | 20.2 | 1,435 | ||
| 32 | 67.0 | SYR | C | 29 | 69 | — | 35.6 | 2,454 | ||
| 33 | 66.0 | FTW | SF | 27 | 69 | — | 36.8 | 2,541 | ||
| 34 | 64.9 | INO | C | 23 | 69 | — | 40.1 | 2,769 | ||
| 35 | 63.8 | NYK | C | 27 | 65 | — | 26.3 | 1,707 | ||
| 36 | 62.8 | INO | SG | 25 | 67 | — | 36.8 | 2,468 | ||
| 37 | 61.7 | MLH / SYR | SF | 25 | 62 | — | 34.6 | 2,148 | ||
| 38 | 60.6 | ROC | C | 28 | 68 | — | 33.6 | 2,288 | ||
| 39 | 59.6 | BLB | PF | 29 | 65 | — | 35.4 | 2,298 | ||
| 40 | 58.5 | PHW | PG | 28 | 55 | — | 23.4 | 1,286 | ||
| 41 | 57.4 | ROC | SF | 28 | 62 | — | 22.8 | 1,414 | ||
| 42 | 56.4 | BLB | SG | 27 | 69 | — | 28.3 | 1,955 | ||
| 43 | 55.3 | ROC | PG | 33 | 66 | — | 33.6 | 2,216 | ||
| 44 | 54.3 | PHW | PG | 30 | 69 | — | 33.9 | 2,336 | ||
| 45 | 53.2 | BOS | SF | 25 | 70 | — | 28.2 | 1,971 | ||
| 46 | 52.1 | BLB | C | 23 | 68 | — | 33.3 | 2,263 | ||
| 47 | 51.1 | FTW | PF | 22 | 68 | — | 33.1 | 2,250 | ||
| 48 | 50.0 | ROC | SF | 32 | 70 | — | 28.3 | 1,984 | ||
| 49 | 48.9 | INO | PG | 26 | 67 | — | 36.7 | 2,459 | ||
| 50 | 47.9 | PHW | SF | 23 | 64 | — | 27.9 | 1,788 |
Showing 1–50 of 50
Page 1 / 1