hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ace Bailey vs. Zaccharie Risacher: 2025–26 season

hussEyquation2025–26 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Zaccharie Risacher leads in impact for 2025–26

Zaccharie Risacher ranks ahead of Ace Bailey in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

-0.9Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6Leads
#370Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#344Leads
-1.92Estimated defensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-0.93Leads
-1.54Estimated offensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-1.33Leads
1.4%Steal rate1.9%Leads
10.3%Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload9.2%Leads
21.4%Offensive usage17.6%
53.3%True shooting %55.7%Leads
9.7%LeadsAssist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court6.8%
8.2%Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court9.3%Leads
72Games67
1,988Minutes1,503

Zaccharie Risacher's estimated impact per 100 possessions was -0.6, compared with -0.9 for Ace Bailey. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2025–26 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Ace Bailey: 72 games and 1,988 minutes. Zaccharie Risacher: 67 games and 1,503 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Ace Bailey ended a larger share of his team’s possessions, so the turnover rates are not an equal-workload comparison. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2025–26 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/ace-bailey/zaccharie-risacher/2025-26

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

The model starts with each player’s recorded individual stats, then adjusts that estimate using lineup results. The first two rows add up to the final estimate. All figures are points per 100 possessions.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
-0.30From recorded individual stats-0.00Leads
-0.61Adjustment from recent lineup results-0.58Leads
-0.91Final estimated impact-0.58Leads

Lineup evidence: Ace Bailey — 1 season; Zaccharie Risacher — 2 seasons. This adjustment is not necessarily based on the selected season alone.

Offensive and defensive lineup estimates for the selected season

These selected-season estimates account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive means better than average; a positive defensive figure means fewer points allowed. They are separate estimates—not additional points added to the calculation above. They do not measure how much individual teammates improved.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
-1.54Adjusted offensive impact-1.33Leads
-1.92Adjusted defensive impact-0.93Leads

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonSocial card: every summary row. Link preview: six key figures.

Full comparison · 2025–26 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9-0.6Better result for this metric.
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#370#344Better result for this metric.
From recorded individual stats-0.30-0.00Better result for this metric.
Adjustment from recent lineup results-0.61-0.58Better result for this metric.

Ace Bailey: 1 season of lineup evidence. Zaccharie Risacher: 2 seasons of lineup evidence. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Final estimated impact-0.91-0.58Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Games7267
Minutes1,9881,503
Offensive usage21.4%17.6%

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
True shooting percentage53.3%55.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Field-goal percentage44.3%45.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage34.4%36.8%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage75.0%Better result for this metric.64.4%
Three-point attempt rateShare of field-goal attempts taken from three; describes shot selection, not quality44.6%48.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court9.7%Better result for this metric.6.8%
Assists per game1.8Better result for this metric.1.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload10.3%9.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court8.2%9.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.2Better result for this metric.3.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Steal rate1.4%1.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Block rateShare of opponents’ two-point attempts blocked while on court2.4%Better result for this metric.2.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Points per game13.8Better result for this metric.9.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Selected-season adjusted lineup estimates

These account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive defense means fewer points allowed. They are separate from the observed results and are not additional points added to the model calculation.

Adjusted lineup estimates: Ace Bailey and Zaccharie Risacher
MetricAce BaileyZaccharie Risacher
Adjusted offensive impact-1.54-1.33Better result for this metric.
Adjusted defensive impact-1.92-0.93Better result for this metric.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Zaccharie Risacher leads in impact for 2025–26.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
-0.9Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6Leads
#370Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#344Leads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Zaccharie Risacher leads every available measure below.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
22Listed-team regular-season wins86Leads
26.8%Listed-team winning percentage52.4%Leads
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
0Playoff team seasons1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
Not availablePlayoff appearances1
Not availablePlayoff games3
Not availableTeam playoff wins2
Not availableFinals appearances0
Not availableChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ace BaileyMetricZaccharie Risacher
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Ace BaileyZaccharie Risacher

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.