hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Anfernee Hardaway vs. Baron Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Baron Davis ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#176Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#109Leads
+7.3LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+6.3
10.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better11.7
+2,076 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,903 ptsLeads
64.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better24.6Leads
+4.8Best 5 average impact+4.8

Career Impact Rank places Baron Davis #109 and Anfernee Hardaway #176. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Anfernee Hardaway had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/anfernee-hardaway/baron-davis/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAnfernee Hardaway22.580 · No. 176Baron Davis15.553 · No. 109

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Anfernee Hardaway

22.580 composite · No. 176 all-time

Anfernee Hardaway's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.00050%5.000
Best 5No. 41995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.40030%4.620
Best 10No. 41995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1232001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1432002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2222003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate64.80020%12.960

5.000 + 4.620 + 12.960= 22.580

Baron Davis

15.553 composite · No. 109 all-time

Baron Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.66750%5.833
Best 5No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate16.00030%4.800
Best 10No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.60020%4.920

5.833 + 4.800 + 4.920= 15.553

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#176#109Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish10.0Better result for this metric.11.7
Best 5 average finish15.4Better result for this metric.16.0
Best 10 average finish64.824.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#167#94Better result for this metric.
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.3Better result for this metric.+6.3
Best 3 average impact+5.8Better result for this metric.+5.5
Best 5 average impact+4.8+4.8
Best 10 average impact+2.7+3.9Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,076 pts+2,903 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons22

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Games704835
Minutes23,71128,592

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
True shooting percentage53.5%Better result for this metric.50.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.5%Better result for this metric.50.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Field-goal percentage45.8%Better result for this metric.40.9%
Three-point percentage31.6%32.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.4%Better result for this metric.71.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile24.1%37.0%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game5.07.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.0%14.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.7%Better result for this metric.6.3%
Rebounds per game4.5Better result for this metric.3.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%2.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%Better result for this metric.0.9%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Anfernee Hardaway and Baron Davis
MetricAnfernee HardawayBaron Davis
Points per game15.216.1Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Baron Davis ranks higher in career impact.

Anfernee HardawayMetricBaron Davis
#176Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#109Leads
+7.3LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+6.3
+4.8Best 5 average impact+4.8
+2,076 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,903 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Anfernee Hardaway leads every available measure below.

Anfernee HardawayMetricBaron Davis
609LeadsListed-team regular-season wins538
50.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage44.3%
5Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Anfernee Hardaway leads every available measure below.

Anfernee HardawayMetricBaron Davis
8LeadsPlayoff appearances7
64LeadsPlayoff games50
27LeadsTeam playoff wins22
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Anfernee Hardaway leads every available measure below.

Anfernee HardawayMetricBaron Davis
4LeadsAll-Star2
0MVP0
3LeadsAll-NBA1
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Anfernee HardawayBaron DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.