hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Baron Davis vs. Chauncey Billups: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Chauncey Billups ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#109Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#84Leads
+6.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.2Leads
+4.8Best 5 average impact+5.6Leads
11.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better8.3Leads
+2,903 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,141 ptsLeads
24.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better24.9

Career Impact Rank places Chauncey Billups #84 and Baron Davis #109. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/baron-davis/chauncey-billups/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBaron Davis15.553 · No. 109Chauncey Billups12.627 · No. 84

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Baron Davis

15.553 composite · No. 109 all-time

Baron Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.66750%5.833
Best 5No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate16.00030%4.800
Best 10No. 62003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.60020%4.920

5.833 + 4.800 + 4.920= 15.553

Chauncey Billups

12.627 composite · No. 84 all-time

Chauncey Billups's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 42007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 42007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 152002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 182004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.60030%3.480
Best 10No. 42007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 152002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 182004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 482001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 632010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.90020%4.980

4.167 + 3.480 + 4.980= 12.627

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#109#84Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish11.78.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish16.011.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish24.6Better result for this metric.24.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#94#80Better result for this metric.
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+6.3+7.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+5.5+6.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+4.8+5.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impact+3.9+4.0Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,903 pts+3,141 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons01Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons22

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Games8351,043
Minutes28,59233,008

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
True shooting percentage50.2%58.0%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.7%59.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Field-goal percentage40.9%41.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.0%38.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage71.1%89.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile37.0%Better result for this metric.29.8%
Assists per game7.2Better result for this metric.5.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.2%13.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%Better result for this metric.5.5%
Rebounds per game3.8Better result for this metric.2.9

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.7%Better result for this metric.1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Baron Davis and Chauncey Billups
MetricBaron DavisChauncey Billups
Points per game16.1Better result for this metric.15.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Chauncey Billups ranks higher in career impact.

Baron DavisMetricChauncey Billups
#109Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#84Leads
+6.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+7.2Leads
+4.8Best 5 average impact+5.6Leads
+2,903 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,141 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Chauncey Billups leads every available measure below.

Baron DavisMetricChauncey Billups
538Listed-team regular-season wins895Leads
44.3%Listed-team winning percentage56.2%Leads
050-win team seasons11Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
7Playoff team seasons15Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Chauncey Billups leads every available measure below.

Baron DavisMetricChauncey Billups
7Playoff appearances12Leads
50Playoff games146Leads
22Team playoff wins84Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Chauncey Billups leads every available measure below.

Baron DavisMetricChauncey Billups
2All-Star5Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA3Leads
0All-Defense2Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Baron DavisChauncey BillupsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.