Chet Walker
1962–63 to 1974–75 · 13 seasons
NBA player comparison
Chet Walker vs. Connie Hawkins: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Chet Walker ranks higher in career impact
Connie Hawkins
1969–70 to 1975–76 · 7 seasons
Impact comparison
#102LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#174
+4.1LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.4
+2.7Best 5 average impact+2.8Leads
11.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better9.0Leads
+2,522 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,826 pts
1Top-10 impact seasons2Leads
Career Impact Rank places Chet Walker #102 and Connie Hawkins #174. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChet Walker14.233 · No. 102Connie Hawkins22.500 · No. 174
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Chet Walker
14.233 composite · No. 102 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 61971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 11.667 | 50% | 5.833 |
| Best 5No. 61971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 14.200 | 30% | 4.260 |
| Best 10No. 61971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 20.700 | 20% | 4.140 |
5.833 + 4.260 + 4.140= 14.233
Connie Hawkins
22.500 composite · No. 174 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 9.000 | 50% | 4.500 |
| Best 5No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 12.600 | 30% | 3.780 |
| Best 10No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 174 | 71.100 | 20% | 14.220 |
4.500 + 3.780 + 14.220= 22.500
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #102Better result for this metric. | #174 |
| Best 3 average finish | 11.7 | 9.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 14.2 | 12.6Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 20.7Better result for this metric. | 71.1 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #126Better result for this metric. | #210 |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +4.1Better result for this metric. | +3.4 |
| Best 3 average impact | +3.1 | +3.2Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average impact | +2.7 | +2.8Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average impact | +1.7 | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +2,522 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +1,826 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 1 | 2Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,032 | 499 |
| Minutes | 33,433 | 17,234 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.0%Better result for this metric. | 53.5% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 54.8%Better result for this metric. | 52.5% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 47.0%Better result for this metric. | 46.7% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 79.6%Better result for this metric. | 78.5% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 10.1% | 16.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.1 | 4.1Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 8.7% | 10.6%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 7.1 | 8.0Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.1% | 2.0%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.1% | 1.3%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Chet Walker | Connie Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 18.2Better result for this metric. | 16.5 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Chet Walker ranks higher in career impact.
Chet WalkerMetricConnie Hawkins
#102LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#174
+4.1LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.4
+2.7Best 5 average impact+2.8Leads
+2,522 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,826 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Chet Walker leads every available measure below.
Chet WalkerMetricConnie Hawkins
979LeadsListed-team regular-season wins656
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage0.4%
11Leads50-win team seasons8
11Leads60-win team seasons8
13LeadsPlayoff team seasons2
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Chet Walker leads every available measure below.
Chet WalkerMetricConnie Hawkins
13LeadsPlayoff appearances2
105LeadsPlayoff games12
48LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Chet WalkerMetricConnie Hawkins
7LeadsAll-Star4
0MVP0
0All-NBA1Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Chet WalkerConnie HawkinsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Chet WalkerNBA seasonConnie Hawkins
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
No season
Season 9
No season
Season 10
No season
Season 11
No season
Season 12
No season
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.