hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Chris Paul vs. Deron Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Chris Paul ranks higher in career impact so far

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Chris Paul

Chris Paul

2005–06 to 2025–26 · 21 seasons · active

Impact comparison
#16LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#215
+10.8LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.7
+9.2LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.5
2.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better19.0
+7,175 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,054 pts
10LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0

Career Impact Rank places Chris Paul #16 and Deron Williams #215. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/chris-paul/deron-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChris Paul2.400 · No. 16Deron Williams28.680 · No. 215

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chris Paul

2.400 composite · No. 16 all-time

Chris Paul's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 22007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.00050%1.000
Best 5No. 22007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 32008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.20030%0.660
Best 10No. 22007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 22012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 32008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3.70020%0.740

1.000 + 0.660 + 0.740= 2.400

Deron Williams

28.680 composite · No. 215 all-time

Deron Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 172008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.00050%9.500
Best 5No. 172008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.60030%6.480
Best 10No. 172008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 642013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1092006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1752005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.50020%12.700

9.500 + 6.480 + 12.700= 28.680

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#16Better result for this metric.#215
Best 3 average finish2.0Better result for this metric.19.0
Best 5 average finish2.2Better result for this metric.21.6
Best 10 average finish3.7Better result for this metric.63.5
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#8Better result for this metric.#169
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+10.8Better result for this metric.+3.7
Best 3 average impact+9.9Better result for this metric.+3.6
Best 5 average impact+9.2Better result for this metric.+3.5
Best 10 average impact+8.1Better result for this metric.+2.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+7,175 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,054 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons8Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons10Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Games1,370845
Minutes45,83628,865

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
True shooting percentage58.0%Better result for this metric.55.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.8%Better result for this metric.55.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Field-goal percentage46.9%Better result for this metric.44.5%
Three-point percentage37.0%Better result for this metric.35.7%
Free-throw percentage87.0%Better result for this metric.82.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.4%Better result for this metric.40.3%
Assists per game9.2Better result for this metric.8.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.0%Better result for this metric.16.1%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.1%Better result for this metric.5.4%
Rebounds per game4.4Better result for this metric.3.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.4%Better result for this metric.1.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.6%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chris Paul and Deron Williams
MetricChris PaulDeron Williams
Points per game16.8Better result for this metric.16.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Chris Paul ranks higher in career impact so far.

Chris PaulMetricDeron Williams
#16LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#215
+10.8LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+3.7
+9.2LeadsBest 5 average impact+3.5
+7,175 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,054 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Chris Paul leads every available measure below.

Chris PaulMetricDeron Williams
1,022LeadsListed-team regular-season wins589
60.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage52.0%
10Leads50-win team seasons4
2Leads60-win team seasons0
15LeadsPlayoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Chris Paul leads every available measure below.

Chris PaulMetricDeron Williams
15LeadsPlayoff appearances9
149LeadsPlayoff games90
81LeadsTeam playoff wins44
1Finals appearances1
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Chris Paul leads every available measure below.

Chris PaulMetricDeron Williams
12LeadsAll-Star3
0MVP0
11LeadsAll-NBA2
9LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chris PaulDeron WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.