Dan Roundfield
1984–85
56 games · 1,492 minutes
NBA player comparison
Dan Roundfield vs. Greg Ballard: 1984–85 season
Regular-season verdict
Greg Ballard leads in impact for 1984–85
Greg Ballard ranks ahead of Dan Roundfield in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.
Greg Ballard
1984–85
82 games · 2,664 minutes
Impact comparison
Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.
-0.7Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
#131Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#46Leads
56Games82
1,492Minutes2,664
10.9PPG13.1Leads
52.4%LeadsTS%51.3%
Greg Ballard's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +1.3, compared with -0.7 for Dan Roundfield. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 1984–85 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Dan Roundfield: 56 games and 1,492 minutes. Greg Ballard: 82 games and 2,664 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 1984–85 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.7 | +1.3Better result for this metric. |
| Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best | #131 | #46Better result for this metric. |
Dan Roundfield: verified lineup window unavailable. Greg Ballard: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 56 | 82 |
| Minutes | 1,492 | 2,664 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 52.4%Better result for this metric. | 51.3% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 46.7% | 48.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 0.0% | 30.4%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 78.1% | 79.5%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 1.8 | 2.5Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 8.1Better result for this metric. | 6.5 |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Dan Roundfield | Greg Ballard |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 10.9 | 13.1Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Greg Ballard leads in impact for 1984–85.
Dan RoundfieldMetricGreg Ballard
-0.7Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
#131Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#46Leads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Greg Ballard leads every available measure below.
Dan RoundfieldMetricGreg Ballard
446Listed-team regular-season wins455Leads
49.4%Listed-team winning percentage50.4%Leads
150-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
8Playoff team seasons8
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Greg Ballard leads every available measure below.
Dan RoundfieldMetricGreg Ballard
7Playoff appearances7
38Playoff games65Leads
16Team playoff wins32Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Dan RoundfieldMetricGreg Ballard
3All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
1All-NBANot available
5All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Selected seasons
Box impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Dan RoundfieldGreg Ballard
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average