hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dan Roundfield vs. Ray Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Dan Roundfield ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#226LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#227
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
24.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.7Leads
+1,793 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,478 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Dan Roundfield #226 and Ray Williams #227. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ray Williams had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/dan-roundfield/ray-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDan Roundfield29.640 · No. 226Ray Williams29.813 · No. 227

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dan Roundfield

29.640 composite · No. 226 all-time

Dan Roundfield's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 211980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.00050%12.000
Best 5No. 211980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.20030%7.860
Best 10No. 211980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.90020%9.780

12.000 + 7.860 + 9.780= 29.640

Ray Williams

29.813 composite · No. 227 all-time

Ray Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.66750%5.833
Best 5No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.00030%6.300
Best 10No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1961986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate88.40020%17.680

5.833 + 6.300 + 17.680= 29.813

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#226Better result for this metric.#227
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.011.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.221.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.9Better result for this metric.88.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#219Better result for this metric.#291
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6+3.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+3.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Better result for this metric.+0.8
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,793 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,478 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Games746655
Minutes23,44318,462

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
True shooting percentage54.0%Better result for this metric.50.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.1%Better result for this metric.50.0%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Field-goal percentage48.5%Better result for this metric.45.1%
Three-point percentage11.5%23.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage73.8%80.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.3%29.5%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.25.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.0%Better result for this metric.18.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.6%Better result for this metric.6.9%
Rebounds per game9.7Better result for this metric.3.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%3.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.8%Better result for this metric.0.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dan Roundfield and Ray Williams
MetricDan RoundfieldRay Williams
Points per game15.215.5Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Dan Roundfield ranks higher in career impact.

Dan RoundfieldMetricRay Williams
#226LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#227
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
+1,793 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,478 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Ray Williams leads every available measure below.

Dan RoundfieldMetricRay Williams
446Listed-team regular-season wins510Leads
49.4%Listed-team winning percentage51.8%Leads
150-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
8Playoff team seasons8

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dan RoundfieldMetricRay Williams
7LeadsPlayoff appearances5
38Playoff games40Leads
16Team playoff wins21Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dan RoundfieldMetricRay Williams
3All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
1All-NBANot available
5All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dan RoundfieldRay WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.