Fat Lever
1982–83 to 1993–94 · 11 seasons
NBA player comparison
Fat Lever vs. Walt Frazier: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Walt Frazier ranks higher in career impact
Walt Frazier
1967–68 to 1979–80 · 13 seasons
Impact comparison
#66Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#36Leads
+6.7LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.1
+5.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.3
5.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better3.0Leads
+3,267 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,675 ptsLeads
4Top-10 impact seasons7Leads
Career Impact Rank places Walt Frazier #36 and Fat Lever #66. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Fat Lever had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedFat Lever9.887 · No. 66Walt Frazier4.960 · No. 36
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Fat Lever
9.887 composite · No. 66 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.333 | 50% | 2.667 |
| Best 5No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 9.000 | 30% | 2.700 |
| Best 10No. 41986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 22.600 | 20% | 4.520 |
2.667 + 2.700 + 4.520= 9.887
Walt Frazier
4.960 composite · No. 36 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 21971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 3.000 | 50% | 1.500 |
| Best 5No. 21971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 4.000 | 30% | 1.200 |
| Best 10No. 21971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 11.300 | 20% | 2.260 |
1.500 + 1.200 + 2.260= 4.960
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #66 | #36Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 5.3 | 3.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 9.0 | 4.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 22.6 | 11.3Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #74 | #54Better result for this metric. |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +6.7Better result for this metric. | +5.1 |
| Best 3 average impact | +6.4Better result for this metric. | +4.6 |
| Best 5 average impact | +5.7Better result for this metric. | +4.3 |
| Best 10 average impact | +3.9Better result for this metric. | +3.4 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +3,267 pts | +3,675 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 1 | 4Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 4 | 7Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 752 | 825 |
| Minutes | 23,814 | 30,965 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 49.6% | 54.2%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 48.9% | 54.0%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.7% | 49.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 31.0%Better result for this metric. | 0.0% |
| Free-throw percentage | 77.1% | 78.6%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 25.6%Better result for this metric. | 23.2% |
| Assists per game | 6.2Better result for this metric. | 6.1 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.4%Better result for this metric. | 12.5% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.7%Better result for this metric. | 7.9% |
| Rebounds per game | 6.0Better result for this metric. | 5.9 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 3.2%Better result for this metric. | 2.3% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.5%Better result for this metric. | 0.3% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Fat Lever | Walt Frazier |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 13.9 | 18.9Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Walt Frazier ranks higher in career impact.
Fat LeverMetricWalt Frazier
#66Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#36Leads
+6.7LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.1
+5.7LeadsBest 5 average impact+4.3
+3,267 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,675 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Fat LeverMetricWalt Frazier
434Listed-team regular-season wins888Leads
48.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
250-win team seasons9Leads
060-win team seasons9Leads
8Playoff team seasons9Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Walt Frazier leads every available measure below.
Fat LeverMetricWalt Frazier
8Playoff appearances8
48Playoff games93Leads
23Team playoff wins54Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships2Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Walt Frazier leads every available measure below.
Fat LeverMetricWalt Frazier
2All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA6Leads
1All-Defense7Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Fat LeverWalt FrazierPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Fat LeverNBA seasonWalt Frazier
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
No season
Season 12Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.