Frank Brickowski
1984–85 to 1996–97 · 12 seasons
NBA player comparison
Frank Brickowski vs. Lowes Moore: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Frank Brickowski ranks higher in career impact
Lowes Moore
1980–81 to 1982–83 · 3 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#1104LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2121
+0.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8
-1.2LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.9
#85LeadsBest league finish#177
+395 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-25 pts
731LeadsGames112
Career Impact Rank places Frank Brickowski #1104 and Lowes Moore #2121. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedFrank Brickowski104.420 · No. 1,104Lowes Moore230.547 · No. 2,121
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Frank Brickowski
104.420 composite · No. 1,104 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 851988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 88.000 | 50% | 44.000 |
| Best 5No. 851988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 99.800 | 30% | 29.940 |
| Best 10No. 851988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1291991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1921984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2411986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3061995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 152.400 | 20% | 30.480 |
44.000 + 29.940 + 30.480= 104.420
Lowes Moore
230.547 composite · No. 2,121 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1771980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2391982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 252.5 | 222.833 | 50% | 111.417 |
| Best 5No. 1771980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2391982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 252.5 | 234.700 | 30% | 70.410 |
| Best 10No. 1771980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2391982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8 open slots × No. 252.5 | 243.600 | 20% | 48.720 |
111.417 + 70.410 + 48.720= 230.547
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 252.5, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #1104Better result for this metric. | #2121 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 88.0Better result for this metric. | 222.8 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 99.8Better result for this metric. | 234.7 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 152.4Better result for this metric. | 243.6 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #897Better result for this metric. | #3583 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.6Better result for this metric. | -1.8 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.4 | Unavailable |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.2 | Unavailable |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -1.2 | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +395 ptsBetter result for this metric. | -25 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 731 | 112 |
| Minutes | 16,278 | 2,118 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 56.8%Better result for this metric. | 48.5% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 56.8%Better result for this metric. | 48.4% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 51.9%Better result for this metric. | 44.2% |
| Three-point percentage | 32.4%Better result for this metric. | 20.0% |
| Free-throw percentage | 74.0% | 75.0%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 11.9% | 18.4%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 1.9 | 2.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 17.8% | 17.4%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.1%Better result for this metric. | 5.8% |
| Rebounds per game | 4.7Better result for this metric. | 2.0 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.9%Better result for this metric. | 1.8% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.0%Better result for this metric. | 0.4% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Frank Brickowski | Lowes Moore |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 10.0Better result for this metric. | 6.7 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Frank Brickowski ranks higher in career impact.
Frank BrickowskiMetricLowes Moore
#1104LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2121
+0.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8
+0.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+395 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-25 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Frank Brickowski leads every available measure below.
Frank BrickowskiMetricLowes Moore
510LeadsListed-team regular-season wins64
44.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage26.0%
3Leads50-win team seasons0
2Leads60-win team seasons0
5LeadsPlayoff team seasons0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Frank BrickowskiMetricLowes Moore
4Playoff appearancesNot available
37Playoff gamesNot available
19Team playoff winsNot available
1Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Frank BrickowskiMetricLowes Moore
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Frank BrickowskiLowes MoorePeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Frank BrickowskiNBA seasonLowes Moore
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
No season
1988–89Age 29 · +0.3 · No. 85Season 5Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate
Season 5No season
Season 6
No season
Season 7
No season
Season 8
No season
Season 9
No season
Season 10
No season
Season 11
No season
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.