113.4 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / CHH / LAL / MIL / SAS / SEA
Frank Brickowski
Frank Brickowski advanced stats and career rankings
99.8 average league finish
395 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Frank Brickowski ranks #2011 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #88.0. His full-career value ranks #897, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Frank Brickowski's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Frank Brickowski ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 113.4
- Qualified seasons
- 10
- All-time rank
- #2011
Every season
Frank Brickowski advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 37 | 17 | 255 | -6.63 | — | — | -23.6 | — | Limited |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 36 | 63 | 986 | -4.69 | 6.2 | #306 | -51.8 | 6th | Established |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | CHH/MIL | 34 | 71 | 2,094 | -0.97 | 46.4 | #157 | 42.7 | 51st | Strong |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 33 | 66 | 2,075 | +0.60 | 69.8 | #90 | 107.8 | 71st | Strong |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 32 | 65 | 1,556 | -0.46 | 55.7 | #129 | 47.5 | 56th | Strong |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 31 | 75 | 1,912 | -0.14 | 58.8 | #121 | 71.2 | 63rd | Strong |
| 1989–90Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 30 | 78 | 1,438 | -0.06 | 60.6 | #114 | 57.3 | 55th | Strong |
| 1988–89Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 29 | 64 | 1,822 | +0.29 | 68.1 | #85 | 90.4 | 67th | Strong |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 28 | 70 | 2,227 | +0.18 | 64.8 | #89 | 105.7 | 73rd | Strong |
| 1986–87Historical Defense Estimate | LAL/SAS | 27 | 44 | 487 | -4.47 | 6.3 | #241 | -25.4 | 12th | Established |
| 1985–86Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 26 | 40 | 311 | -4.91 | — | — | -18.4 | — | Limited |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 25 | 78 | 1,115 | -2.35 | 24.5 | #192 | -8.2 | 24th | Strong |
Career movement
Frank Brickowski's career impact by season
Peak +0.60 in 1992–93 · 12 seasons · 16,278 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Frank Brickowski
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
Dave Corzine
92%career match
91% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 1987–88C · All-Time Career #849Mel Counts
92%career match
90% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 1974–75C · All-Time Career #2142Jeff Foster
92%career match
94% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 2007–08C · All-Time Career #1793Dennis Awtrey
91%career match
82% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 1976–77C · All-Time Career #2545Adonal Foyle
91%career match
87% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 2004–05PF · All-Time Career #1768John Salley
91%career match
86% season match · 1992–93 ↔ 1994–95Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →